The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
How to Increase eCommerce Sales with SEO
How to Increase eCommerce Sales with SEO
February 28, 2024

With the development of the online shopping market, SEO has become a crucial factor in driving targeted traffic and increasing sales. Effective...

Professors at CSU give 1 star to

Internet traffic on is primarily made up of two categories of people: genuinely concerned students and internet trolls.

Several professors at Colorado State University are in agreement that websites like are unreliable in determining the competency of a teacher, as comments range from constructive criticism to cruelty.


Rate My Professors allows college students to score their professors, rating them a number between one and five. Each score is accompanied by a comment, explaining why that certain score was granted.

Jodie Kreider, an assistant teaching professor in the CSU department of history, hasn’t looked at her rating for more than 10 years, and she said ratings have an effect on teachers.

“It’s really hard to read them because you’re opening yourself up, and you might have 99% of them be awesome,” Kreider said. “But that one that’s negative? Just, you have no idea how that messes with us. … Those are the ones that stick with you and give you an insecurity complex.”

Airica Parker, a senior instructor in the CSU department of English, agreed that the emotional toll a rating can have on a teacher is very real.

“I think students don’t always see things from teachers’ perspectives,” Parker said. “(Students) don’t always realize that we’re people too and that we have really complex reactions to very complex inputs that we’re receiving.” 

Professors often encourage constructive criticism. However, Parker and Kreider don’t look to to find that feedback.

The numbers represented on websites like account for a small number of the student population, according to Parker, and that can diminish some of its reliability.

Course evaluations are the primary way students can voice their opinions of a class, according to Kerry MacFarland, an assistant professor in the CSU department of chemistry.

“We’re looking for areas to improve, things that are strengths that we want to continue,” MacFarland said. “We’re looking for feedback, and constructive feedback is always appreciated.” 


However, professors sometimes receive comments aimed to insult, and their content has no relation to their teaching.

“I can’t handle your out-of-date pop culture references, the tone of your voice reaches a certain level that makes my brain itch and I can hardly stand to listen any longer,” wrote an anonymous commenter on

Online evaluations like these tend to be written by those with extreme opinions, whether positive or negative, and don’t represent the average student, according to Kreider.

(Students) don’t always realize that we’re people too .” -Jodie Kreider,  Assistant Teaching Professor  CSU Department of History

There are a number of variables that influence the way a professor is rated in online forums or course evaluations. Kreider, Parker and MacFarland agreed that a major component in online ratings is the level of difficulty presented in the classes.

“I guess I would just wonder if teachers are concerned about the fairness of how they’re being represented publicly,” Parker said. “Does that make them less willing to be a challenging teacher when in fact being a challenging teacher may be the very thing that brings out the best in their students?” 

Other components that can play into teacher ratings on websites and course evaluations are gender and race, and CSU has worked on revamping course evaluations to discourage bias, according to MacFarland.

“They’re incredibly gendered,” Kreider said. “Race (and) gender are huge. Younger female faculty find themselves judged in ways that men never are. There’s a whole thing with professors with accents or often from foreign countries that find themselves judged in ways that native English speakers are not. As you get older, there (are) different kinds of judgments.”

That is not to say all Rate My Professors ratings are biased or that students might not get anything from the website.

Ryan Torrez, a freshman human development and family studies major at CSU, used the website to research professors before registering for spring classes.

After looking up one professor he had this fall and agreeing with the positive comments she had received, he decided to search for more professors.

“For (a certain professor), (the rating) was true,” Torrez said. “I don’t know if that’s true for the other professors because I’ve never met them, but I’m gonna go off of the fact that since hers was correct, I’ll trust that the other ones are semi-correct.” 

Despite the negative opinions of Rate My Professors from many CSU faculty, however, Kreider believes that the website has at least gotten better over the years.

“I think it’s improved,” Kreider said. “They got rid of the chili pepper for hotness. People used to go and put chili peppers on the faculty that they thought were hot. That’s how you know (it’s) not a legitimate academic tool.” 

Joey Wagner can be reached at or on Twitter @joeyleewagner.

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Hey, thanks for visiting!
We’d like to ask you to please disable your ad blocker when looking at our site — advertising revenue directly supports our student journalists and allows us to bring you more content like this.

Comments (0)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *