The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
Lando Norris in Miami. Accident win or the birth of a new star?
May 17, 2024

  On May 5, 2024, an essential event for Formula 1 occurred in Miami. One of the favorites of the world public, the Briton Lando...

Fox News and Bill O’Reilly are more of the same

Zack Burley
Zack Burley

Bill O’Reilly is a hack.

A recent Mother Jones article outlines various inconsistencies in the FoxNews talk show host’s account of his time covering the war in the Falklands. The criticisms were not denied with supporting facts or conflicting accounts, but with the rhetorical flair O’Reilly has become known for. Who else responds to professional criticisms by calling the critic a “despicable guttersnipe?”


But, unsurprisingly, new developments show that the Falklands war tale isn’t the only credibility gap O’Reilly has to combat. A report by CNN claims that a personal anecdote in O’Reilly’s book, “Killing Kennedy,” contradict other accounts of his whereabouts.

While calling out O’Reilly’s credibility is great sport, the path to reconciling his continued appearances on air while Brian Williams sits home on suspension for similar circumstances is less clear.

The problem remains that Bill O’Reilly never deserved to be held to a journalistic standard in the first place. He gave that up years ago, when he decided to work for FoxNews. Now I know that Fox still gets great ratings and that Bill’s words do carry weight for millions. But that doesn’t mean FoxNews can’t also be described as an Orwellian, hate-spewing, bile-inducing, propaganda tool of a 1-percenter billionaire masquerading as a populist. Any media individual who works for them is choosing to sell their credibility to support a partisan agenda that treats facts as inconveniences.

The whole organization is right out of “V for Vendetta,” or an older example, “1984.” Is Bill O’Reilly that different in his discursive method than Commander Prothero? Don’t the logical pivots during debates with Fox correspondents seem more like Newspeak than news speak? Isn’t O’Reilly literally rewriting parts of history, books that have been called into question by the historical community? Does the fear of other groups, like immigrants, Muslims and homosexuals drive the Fox machine?

Not really, yes, yes, yes. Great, now that we’ve answered my rant questions, we can talk about why all this matters. The news feeding frenzy on Fox and O’Reilly isn’t really going to change much for FoxNews, since they respond to financial and owner concerns as opposed to preserving journalistic integrity, and their audience doesn’t trust what any non-right wing media source says. Their credibility outside of that limited group is abysmal — their slogan “We Report, You Decide” is the laughingstock of serious journalists.

The good thing in all of this is that each organization handles the controversy in a way that tells viewers what they value. NBC’s and most media business’ models work when viewers trust them. The lack of trust toward media is what FoxNews feeds on. Hence, Brian Williams is suspended for lying, while Bill O’Reilly and his superiors shrug it off when he does the same thing.

Know the agenda of your information providers, not by their mission statement, but by how they respond to outside stimuli. Cynics may see the “no-spin zone” tomorrow and think about how unfair it is that this man can lie without consequence. It isn’t fair, but in the context of the network he works for, it’s just another day at Fox.

Collegian Opinion Editor Zack Burley can be reached at or on Twitter @zackburley.

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Comments (0)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *