The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
The Importance of Supporting Engineering Education
The Importance of Supporting Engineering Education
February 20, 2024

In today's era of information technology, engineering plays the role of a vanguard, trying to optimize processes and develop new products, making...

Release, protest and working for democracy in Egypt

The cocktail of a successful protest is tricky. What ingredients leave a lasting impression versus a sour taste?

No one has a more bitter taste in their mouths than Egypt. In 2011, they were the stage of a swift and vivacious movement toward freedom. Just three years later, Abdul-Fattah el-Sisi rode a coup d’etat, or military coup, into office. Democratically-elected president, Mohammed Morsi, was tried and imprisoned.

Ad

On Saturday, Egyptian courts, pressured by the new military rule, dropped the case against Hosni Mubarak, the man believed to give the order to kill protesters in 2011. To make matters worse, the same courts sentenced 188 protesters in support of Morsi to death this past Tuesday.

So what went wrong so fast? Shadi Hamid in the New York Times explained that presidents can easily consolidate power  “in young democracies with weak institutions.” Though, there has to be more to it than that?

In global democracy, Egypt was the new kid on the block. It was wrought with insecurity and a large pile of debt. Egypt’s road map to democracy was fuzzy, if not non-existent. They heard stories of democracy in far off neighborhoods, but lacked a good role model.

Democracy alone is too broad a term to found a modern nation on, especially one rich with Eastern traditions. It takes faith in words and ideas to install a new government. Their ethical code is very different than ours — not worse — but different. Egypt lacked that unifying voice. Their government was a poorly assembled toothpick model of democracy.

Let’s look at successful American movements. They all had one, succinct, underlying piece of rhetoric. American independence was organized under the writings of British philosopher John Locke. The civil rights movement of the mid-20th century was founded upon the words of Martin Luther King Junior and poets like Ginsberg, musicians like Bob Dylan. This speech inspired but also gave a clear blueprint for the future, like an IKEA shelf (did I just compare the civil rights movement to IKEA?).

So, what’s the next step for Egypt and neighboring countries? The social media platform is a good place to start. We already saw its effectiveness in organizing protests during the 2011 Egyptian movement. Social media was the wave of success Barack Obama rode into office in 2008. What the printing press was to 18th century democracy, social media is to 21st century democracy.

We know Egypt is capable of change through protest, so let’s inspire them through rhetoric, not just cheers and nods toward democracy.

Collegian Columnist Jake Schwebach can be reached at letters@collegian.com.

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Hey, thanks for visiting Collegian.com!
We’d like to ask you to please disable your ad blocker when looking at our site — advertising revenue directly supports our student journalists and allows us to bring you more content like this.

Comments (0)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *