The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
Five Things We Learned Delivering Over Half a Million Orders for NoCo Restaurants
Five Things We Learned Delivering Over Half a Million Orders for NoCo Restaurants
November 8, 2023

  In May 2019, Nosh began as a humble restaurant co-op with just three people. When the pandemic hit in March 2020, while many businesses...

The ghost of Hughes: A timeline of the historical stadium

For today’s students, Hughes Stadium is little more than a historical memory which once occupied the now empty plot of land near the Aggie “A” painted on the foothills. But for Colorado State University, half a decade of controversy went into its demolition, and years later, heated discussion about the area’s future still draws hundreds to City meetings. To fully understand the emotions surrounding the ghost of Hughes requires looking into its past. 

The following article is a complete aggregation of the Collegian’s coverage from 2012 to 2020 regarding the Hughes Stadium property. The interactive timeline captures major events only. View the timeline on mobile


Goodbye to Hughes: How Colorado State University decided to replace the decades-old stadium

Dec. 1, 2011: Colorado State University hired athletic director John C. “Jack” Graham. He was crucial in making the long-theorized on-campus stadium a serious goal, according to The Coloradoan

Spring 2012

Jan. 30, 2012: Save Our Stadium CSU Facebook page is launched, a vocal opponent of a new stadium.

May 30, 2012: Throughout the spring semester, the Stadium Advisory Committee worked to put together a proposal for then CSU president, Tony Frank, about the possible new stadium’s location between Pitkin and Laurel and cost, which would be $220 million for the stadium and $246 million when including other facilities. They presented findings at a public meeting but were not completely done with their investigation by May 30. Frank pushed back his final decision to the fall semester.

Summer 2012

June 18, 2012: Both supporters and opponents of the potential Hughes replacement continued to voice their opinions over the summer. The Committee continued to investigate the possibility of building a new stadium through the summer as well as its ramifications for Hughes.

July 17, 2012: The Coloradoan investigated two dozen emails between members of the CSU administration, showing little focus on renovating Hughes and more ideas for a new stadium. CSU responded that there are “existing plans for expansion and renewal.”

July 26, 2012: A majority of CSU students don’t support an on-campus stadium, according to a survey of over 3,500 students conducted by the Associated Students of CSU.

Fall 2012

Aug. 1, 2012: Frank hosted a public forum about the stadium issue, one of the last chances for public input. It lasted four hours. 

Aug. 9, 2012: The Stadium Advisory Committee delivered its final report. 


Aug. 19, 2012: The Collegian Editorial Board endorsed the development of an on-campus stadium.

Sep. 26, 2012: Temple University sports economist Joel Maxcy presents an analysis saying the University is more likely to lose money off a new stadium and that CSU’s feasibility study was “extremely optimistic.”

Oct. 1, 2012: Frank announced that the University will explore options for an on-campus stadium to propose to the CSU System’s Board of Governors within the next two years. He intended to fund 50% of the project from private donations and said that “general funds, student tuition or fees or proceeds from any tax shouldn’t be used to finance the stadium.” If a viable funding plan fell through, they would look at renovating Hughes for a minimum of $30 million, Frank wrote.

Oct. 2, 2012: Opposing group Save Our Stadium Hughes says they will continue to fight the decision. Supporter group, Be Bold, says they will help with stadium fundraising efforts. 

Oct. 4, 2012: The BOG approves CSU to move forward with fundraising efforts. 

Dec. 12, 2012: CSU hires new senior associate athletic director, David Crum, whose main job will be to raise donations to fund the University’s new on-campus stadium. The plan is to raise at least $110 million in donations — to fund the estimated $246 million project — and pay the other half in bonds. 

Spring 2013

Feb. 25, 2013: CSU went silent about stadium fundraising efforts as they collected from big donors first. The Board of Governors marked October 2014 for when they wished to see a report about the donations.

Fall 2013

Oct. 3, 2013: Discussion of the on-campus stadium plan incorporated discussion of adding at least 55,000 square feet of academic facilities to the building for the cost of $17.5 million. 

Oct. 15, 2013: City Council has its first public discussion over the on-campus stadium. Their opinions are all over the board. 

Spring 2014

April 2, 2014: Frank said they have less than half of the desired $110 million private funding for the stadium that they had hoped for.

Summer 2014

July 10, 2014: Developers of on-campus stadium say light and noise emitted from the stadium will be directed north toward residence halls and other academic buildings on campus but will shield nearby neighborhoods.

Fall 2014

Aug. 8, 2014: Frank fired Graham due to “substantial differences” between their views but emphasizes that it has nothing to do with the stadium. Graham said his firing was “surprising.”

Aug. 24, 2014: Two years after deciding to pursue new stadium funding, the University fell short of the $110 million Frank intended to put into the $220 million idea.

Sep. 25, 2014: Frank announced that he wants an additional two months to explore other options for funding the on-campus stadium, as private donations fell short. He proposed several options: 1) renew Hughes as needed; 2) renovate Hughes for long-term; 3) build the new on-campus stadium in phases; and 4) rebid on the on-campus plan as a public-private partnership.

Oct. 2, 2014: CSU Board of Governors postponed their vote on the stadium, giving Frank more time to analyze his options.

Nov. 18, 2014: CSU hosted Hughes Stadium tours to show the community what it would take to renovate the building. It had glaring issues with seating, wheelchair accessibility and it could only host football games.

Nov. 19, 2014: The athletics department, Facilities and two CSU committees all recommended building an on-campus stadium instead of renovating Hughes Stadium, using either option 3 or option 4.

Nov. 29, 2014: Frank recommended the construction of an on-campus stadium. He released his decision the Saturday before the official BOG meeting.

Dec. 5, 2014: A majority of CSU students supported renovating Hughes over building a new stadium, according to a survey conducted by ASCSU where over 800 students responded.

Dec. 5, 2014: The BOG approved an on-campus stadium built using bond financing.

A Stadium on Campus: The buildup of Canvas and tearing down of Hughes

Spring 2015

Jan. 26, 2015: The state Legislature’s Capital Development Committee was set to vote on Frank’s plan to borrow $220 million in revenue bonds for the construction of an on-campus stadium. Sen. John Kefalas of Fort Collins had concerns about the University’s debt.

Feb. 4, 2015: As the new stadium construction eliminates 1,500 parking spots, CSU talked about plans to build new parking facilities on campus and develop game-day traffic plans with the City.

Feb. 5, 2015: Board of Governors authorized a $242 million finance plan for the stadium. The total cost after the 40-year repayment plan, beginning March 2018, is estimated to be $451 million. 

March 17, 2015: City Council narrowly passes an Intergovernmental Agreement with CSU to mitigate on-campus stadium impact through shared responsibilities and transit improvements. 

March 24, 2015: CSU System sold $239 million in bond sales for construction of the new on-campus stadium, according to a press release. The bonds sold in less than 90 minutes.

May 18, 2015: About 10 CSU students and one Fort Collins resident gathered at the new stadium site to protest preparation for its construction. 

May 20, 2015: Meridian Avenue is closed as preparation for stadium construction began.

Summer 2015

June 19, 2015: The BOG approved adding an $18.5 million alumni center and academic addition to the stadium.

Fall 2015

Aug. 23, 2015: Campus closures continued into the fall semester, disrupting student transit and parking. 

Sep. 12, 2015: CSU hosted a ceremonial groundbreaking celebration on campus to mark the new stadium’s construction. Supporters and protesters alike were present. 

Oct. 14, 2015: CSU remained unsure about what to do with the old Hughes Stadium. The City and CSU started a discussion about its uses, instead of leaving it empty as a fallback.

Summer 2016

July 7, 2016: CSU kicks off “Farewell Hughes” campaign to be held during the 2016 football season

July 16, 2016: CSU reports $22 million in stadium funding during its most successful fundraising year yet.

Fall 2016

Aug. 2, 2016: Structural construction of the on-campus stadium was completed. 

Nov. 17, 2016: On-campus stadium construction moved the perennial demonstration gardens north of University Center of the Arts.

Nov. 19, 2016: Rams beat University of New Mexico Lobos 49-31 in the final game at Hughes Stadium.

Summer 2017

July 24, 2017: Single-game tickets for the inaugural football game at the new on-campus stadium are officially sold out.

Fall 2017

Aug. 5, 2017: Fans gathered to see the grand opening of the stadium to the public.

Aug. 26, 2017: The football team wins their first game in the new stadium against Oregon State.

Oct. 5, 2017: The BOG votes unanimously to demolish Hughes Stadium for an estimated cost of $4-6 million.

Oct. 17, 2017: Residents give input to what should be done with the old Hughes land at one of many Hughes Redevelopment Listening Sessions.

Spring 2018

Spring 2018: Planned for the summer, Hughes Stadium was approved for demolition for $5.5 million.

Feb. 8, 2018: CSU submits the 162 acres of Hughes property to be annexed into the City.

Feb. 9, 2018: New stadium outperformed first-year expectations for net income by 32% and total expenses by 69%. CSU ended with a $13.16 million net income, feathering down to a $5.3 million surplus.

April 19, 2018: CSU and Public Service Credit Union announced a lucrative naming-rights deal for the stadium. At $37.7 million, it is one of the largest naming-rights deals in college athletics.

Summer 2018

June 5, 2018: The new stadium was officially named Canvas Stadium.

The Ghost of Hughes: What is being done with the land previously known as Hughes Stadium

Spring 2019

Feb. 7, 2019: The BOG sold the old Hughes Stadium land to Lennar for $10 million.  Lennar planned to develop 600 to 700 homes in the 161-acre land.

Summer 2019

July 18, 2019: City Council took the unusual move of initiating the rezoning of the Hughes’ land. That means Lennar cannot feasibly move forward with development proposals until the Council decides what kind of zoning they want for the area.

Fall 2019

Sep. 23, 2019: The Fort Collins Planning and Zoning board recommends a low-density residential zoning for the Hughes Stadium site, at the urging of many resident comments.

Nov. 6, 2019: City Council approves zoning the land with a higher density portion. This was suggested by staff and previously voted against by the P&Z Board. Attending residents were overwhelmingly against Council’s narrowly voted-in choice. To finalize the vote, Council must approve it again at a second hearing.

Nov. 20, 2019: The second hearing of the Hughes rezoning is delayed after two residents file an ethics complaint against councilmembers Mayor Wade Troxell and Mayor Pro Tem Kristin Stephens over their employment at CSU.

Dec. 16, 2019: The Ethics Review Board cleared Troxell and Stephens of the complaint, saying the complaint did not warrant further investigation.

Spring 2020

Jan. 21, 2020: The second hearing of the Hughes rezoning is delayed again after a different resident filed an ethics complaint against councilmembers Troxell, Stephens and Ken Summers.

March 8, 2020: The Ethics Review Board decides to initiate an investigation into Summers over his lobbying business. They cleared Troxell and Stephens again.

Mar. 13, 2020: The Ethics Review Board clears Summers of any conflicts of interest.

March 17, 2020: Several councilmembers had to self-quarantine from exposure to COVID-19, delaying the second hearing of the Hughes rezoning.

May 19, 2020: Council deadlocks 3-3 on finalizing the rezoning decision. Stephens recused herself from the vote after a third ethics complaint was filed against her and Troxell at the state level. No decision was made about what land use zoning to give the old stadium land.

Summer 2020

June 15, 2020: Frank, no longer the CSU president but still the CSU System Chancellor, was expected to discuss the Hughes development at the Aug. 4 City Council meeting, according to reporting from the Coloradoan.

July 21, 2020: The City considers purchasing some or all of the Hughes land, according to reporting from the Coloradoan. The rezoning discussion and Council discussion with Frank is postponed.

Aug. 24, 2020: Citizen group PATHS (Planning Action to Transform Hughes Sustainably) submits a ballot measure to make the City of Fort Collins purchase the Hughes land for open space, according to reporting from the Coloradoan. They need to obtain 3820 valid signatures to put it on the April 2021 ballot.

Samantha Ye can be reached at or on Twitter @samxye4.

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Hey, thanks for visiting!
We’d like to ask you to please disable your ad blocker when looking at our site — advertising revenue directly supports our student journalists and allows us to bring you more content like this.

Comments (0)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *