The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
The Impact of Technological Innovations on Sports Betting in Colorado: A Primer
The Impact of Technological Innovations on Sports Betting in Colorado: A Primer
April 18, 2024

In the sports betting domain, Colorado stands as a unique arena where technological advancements have significantly reshaped the landscape. As...

Why didn’t Larry Eustachy call timeout?

Lost in the madness of Colorado State’s controversial 97-93 win Wednesday night over Boise State in Moby Arena was CSU head coach Larry Eustachy’s decision not to call a timeout when his team had possession with the shot clock turned off both at the end of regulation, and then again in overtime.

It is common in college basketball for coaches to, well, over-coach. Sometimes it is more fun to simply watch the players play. 

Ad

CSU point guard John Gillon brings the ball up court against Boise State. (Abbie Parr/Collegian)
CSU point guard John Gillon brings the ball up court against Boise State. (Abbie Parr/Collegian)

But even for Eustachy, who had built more a reputation as a defensive-minded coach rather than an offensive mastermind with a diverse set of out-of-bounds plays, it just seemed strange.

He explained that the decision involved emulating an NBA great.

“A lot of guys love to control it,” Eustachy said. “I watch Jerry Sloan, and of course he had John Stockton and Karl Malone, but he never took a timeout at the end because it gives the defense a chance. I mean, we struggled to get it in at the end, and then they trap. So, we could turn it over trying to get it in to run the play we want to run.”

After a bucket by James Webb tied things up at 74-74 with 23 seconds remaining in regulation, the Rams inbounded the ball under their own basket without taking a timeout, and then did not call a timeout after crossing half court either.

A similar scenario played out in the first overtime, with CSU again inbounding the ball under its own basket with 23 seconds on the clock (this time with the game tied at 84-84). Once again, no timeout upon crossing half court.

“We were trying to get John (Gillon) to go 1-4 flat instead of the on-ball,” Eustachy said. “If I took a timeout to explain that, we might have turned it over trying to get it in.”

In other words, Eustachy wants to give the ball handler room to operate against his man 1-on-1. He would rather take his chance letting Gillon use his speed, handling and passing to advance the ball and get a good look, rather than clogging the ball handler’s area with a teammate to swing the ball to or to screen the on-ball defender.

Considering how much trouble CSU has had inbounding the ball, both against Boise and all season prior, it is not the worst bet.

“But when we did finally get it right and not hand it back to Antwan (Scott), but John (Gillon) had it and we went flat, we made some pretty good plays,” Eustachy said. “So, the choice has always been to just let them play. Trust in the guys.”

Ad

So, that was the head coach’s logic. In regulation, it resulted in a close look that nearly won the game for the Rams. In the first overtime, it resulted in Scott shooting a bit too early, and nearly cost them the game.

Whether not calling a timeout was a good call, either in regulation or in the first overtime, will always be up for debate. 

Collegian Sports Editor Emmett McCarthy can be reached at sports@collegian.com and on Twitter @emccarthy22.

View Comments (8)
More to Discover

Comments (8)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *