The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
The Impact of Technological Innovations on Sports Betting in Colorado: A Primer
The Impact of Technological Innovations on Sports Betting in Colorado: A Primer
April 18, 2024

In the sports betting domain, Colorado stands as a unique arena where technological advancements have significantly reshaped the landscape. As...

CSU community reacts to CDC recommendation that women 15-44 should not consume alcohol

The Center for Disease Control recently released new information directed toward women in their child-bearing years and the possible negative effects that alcohol consumption could have on pregnancy.

According to the CDC website, alcohol use during pregnancy, even within the first few weeks and before a woman knows she is pregnant, can cause lasting physical, behavioral and intellectual disabilities that can last a child’s lifetime. These disabilities are known as fetal alcohol spectrum disorders.  

Ad

But beyond the issue of FASD, many at Colorado State University see the recommendations as narrowly focused.

“I am a little disappointed in the CDC, because I think it’s a little short-sighted to single out half the population when it comes to alcohol consumption,” said Casey Malsam, victim advocate for the Women and Gender Advocacy Center. “There are problems with alcohol consumption for all bodies, not just women’s bodies, so if it’s that big of an issue for the CDC to put out alcohol education, they should do comprehensive education and not just shame part of the community by putting responsibility on women.”

According to the latest CDC Vital Signs report, an estimated 3.3 million women between the ages of 15 and 44 years are at risk of exposing their developing baby to alcohol because they are drinking, sexually active and not using birth control to prevent pregnancy.

“Women are more than walking, talking wombs, and I think the health of an individual should come before the health of a possibility,” biology and women’s studies major Molly Rogers wrote in an email to the Collegian. “They claimed that the high rate of unexpected/unplanned pregnancies fueled this suggestion, but why not then combat the real issue — help stop unplanned pregnancies by offering more comprehensive sex education and making birth control more accessible.”

When it comes to the reproduction process, women are not the only ones responsible for procreation, and men are not always going to be women’s sexual preference, Malsam said.

“Part of their saying this is because alcohol can cause birth defects. Well, men consuming alcohol can also cause birth defects,” Malsam said. “Additionally, it’s pretty heteronormative when were thinking about alcohol consumption that we think all women are having sex with men and could theoretically get pregnant from a man. It excludes vast proportions of our population by narrowing that focus down.”

Women’s life goals, ideals and positions have changed over the years, and women now have more choices and opportunities outside the home. To some, the CDC’s view of women seems a little outdated.

“I think it’s ridiculous, because not all women want to have children and not all women can,” said biology major Victoria Dinkel. “I think, historically, it always happens — women get told what they can and can’t do when men have free range.”

Some also say the CDC is not addressing the most important issue.

Ad

“I don’t think drinking is necessarily the major problem here,” Rogers wrote. “It’s the concept that women are expected to have children, and therefore must constantly be of perfect health, which not only excludes women not interested in children, it excludes those who aren’t capable of having children — trans women, chronically ill or disabled women and poor or rural women who can’t access or afford health care. This type of backwards suggestion coming from an institution as valued as the CDC, for me, shows how deeply ingrained sexist gender roles are in our society.”

There are some risks of alcohol consumption by women that the CDC listed that seem to be risks that involve much more than alcohol.

“It’s also problematic because it lists a whole bunch of side effects of alcohol, and some of those are not actually side affects of alcohol,” Malsam said. “Some of those are side effects of people being pretty lousy human beings to others who have been consuming alcohol. They list violence. Well, alcohol isn’t going to hit you over the head or assault you, it’s going to be a perpetrator of domestic violence.”

Collegian Reporter Ashley Haberman can be reached at news@collegian.com.

View Comments (12)
More to Discover

Comments (12)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • U

    US_Citizen71Feb 15, 2016 at 2:34 pm

    Did Molly Roberts bother to read more than the headline from the CDC article or just go off half-cocked after reading it? The article reads far from shaming anyone.

    Reply
  • A

    AnonymousFeb 15, 2016 at 2:10 pm

    I must say I have been disappointing in my generation before and this furthers my feelings. I don’t see how a health advisory has anything to do with ‘feelings.’ People seem to find any reason they can to complain about how they are being discriminated against even when pertaining to something strictly scientific. If it upsets you that some ‘sexist’ person suggests to be more cautious about what you consume when you are trying to get or are pregnant simply for the health of the baby then I believe you have much bigger problems. If you can’t sum up the courage to be sober for nine months so that your child’s chances of having a good life increase then do not complain when some kind of birth defect happens to your kid. At the end of the day your life boils down to the choices you make. Once everyone stops pointing the blame at others and actually takes responsibility and ‘grows up,’ then and only then will the world be a better place. Don’t do it for yourself do it for your children as this is the sole topic of interest here.

    Reply
  • M

    Michael CooleyFeb 15, 2016 at 1:45 pm

    So where’s the other side of the story? In my Journalism 101 class, the first thing we learned was that there are always two sides to an argument. For instance, upon reading the CDC article, the first paragraph helps to explain the focus on women. In fact, the very first sentenence of the first paragraph states, “Although men are more likely…”. It goes on to state that differences in body structure and chemistry results in women absorbing alcohol at a faster pace and being slower at breaking it down, meaning they are more vulnerable to the long term effects of alcohol and trying to stress that less alcohol for a woman has the same effect as more alcohol for a man. Nothing sexist – just scientific gender differences. So the next time a man tries to call a woman a “lightweight”, say, “Yep, thats science!” and don’t take it as a challenge to keep up withe them. The very last paragraph focuses again on making it clear that both men and women are susceptible to long term effects of alcohol. This is not a political statement and shouldn’t be construed as one. Sorry!

    Reply