The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
How Can Colorado Quarterback Shedeur Sanders Improve For the 2025 NFL Draft?
How Can Colorado Quarterback Shedeur Sanders Improve For the 2025 NFL Draft?
June 6, 2024

Colorado quarterback Shedeur Sanders stands out as a prime prospect for the 2025 NFL Draft, and it’s no surprise he's the current favorite...

Brull: Williamson and Pringle — good ideas, poor planning

graphic illustration of figures flagging down in various booths of the ASCSU cabinet
(Graphic illustration by Abby Flitton | The Collegian)

Editor’s Note: All opinion section content reflects the views of the individual author only and does not represent a stance taken by The Collegian or its editorial board.

John Williamson and David Pringle aren’t unique candidates. Of course, none of the Associated Students of Colorado State University campaigns really present unique choices. All generally emphasize vague notions of transparency, the “college experience” (as if it were such a singular monolith) and a couple nod toward sustainability. The devil is in the details though; proposed policy offerings differ from candidate to candidate.


I’ll focus, then, on Williamson and Pringle’s flagship policies rather than the vague promises for transparency and sustainability they share with other candidates. Emphasizing their campaign focus on extracurricular club involvement, Williamson and Pringle distinguish themselves with proposed scholarships for students participating in student organizations on campus. These $500 gifts could, according to the pair, allow students to invest time in on-campus engagement without suffering financial penalties.

“There is an opportunity cost for literally everything,” Williamson said during the ASCSU presidential debate. “If you have to take (time) off work to go to your club meeting, that’s going to cost you. If you have to pay for these things, that’s going to cost you.”

Men posing
Associated Students of Colorado State University vice presidential candidate David Pringle (left) and presidential candidate John Williamson (right) pose for a portrait on The Oval Feb. 28. (Tri Duong | The Collegian)

The goal is noble, perhaps, but several questions remain surrounding costs and implementation. Williamson indicates student fees, limited as they are, may not be enough. To remedy the shortcoming, he proposes what he calls an entrepreneurial approach: extra ASCSU fundraising.

It remains unclear, though, how the administration would acquire enough funds for a widely impactful program. Furthermore, there is not a concrete spending limit or goal on the proposed policy. The lack of clear goals does not inspire confidence, especially considering the precarious nature of funding.

Selection criteria and capacity for these scholarships also seem dubious at best. What qualifies as extracurricular participation? Does the policy account for outreach? Would financial need be accounted for? Can ASCSU even process all the applications for such a scholarship? If Williamson and Pringle’s flagship plan were to pass, it is unclear how it would succeed.

Club fundraising also plays a key role in Williamson and Pringle’s campaign. Williamson expressed open opportunities for clubs to participate in ASCSU sponsored funding. The campaign also indicated potential partnerships with local food trucks to raise funds for participating organizations.

It is unclear what benefits the student organizations would accrue working with ASCSU. Clubs already have broad access to campus venues and no incentive to share their hard earned fundraising gains with ASCSU offers. If Williamson and Pringle want such a policy to work, they’d need to make it a near over-sweet deal.

Finally, the pair wishes to reduce temporary parking pass costs for students.

“We feel that we should have potentially better rates for parking,” Williamson said. “It’s really expensive, and a lot of students don’t have the money to park on campus.”


Undoubtedly, such price reductions would benefit students across campus, but like the scholarship program, costs and implementation remain unclear. If the pair makes it to office, they will undoubtedly have to address these issues.

Unlike many of the other candidates, Williamson and Pringle seem to have tangible plans to improve student life. They take a proactive rather than “we want to hear your ideas” approach, which is frankly refreshing. That being said, the implementation and viability of any of these plans remains uncertain.

In all, Williamson and Pringle seem to be a sober, trustable pair of candidates with questionably effective but concrete plans. If you are willing to adopt the uncertainty surrounding such plans, by all means vote for the pair. Their policies are proactive.

Regardless of your position, voting starts March 30-April 1. Remember to place your vote on RAMweb.

Paul Brull can be reached at or on Twitter @CSUCollegian.

Leave a Comment
More to Discover
About the Contributor
Paul Brull
Paul Brull, Cannabis Director
In 2020, Paul Brull joined The Rocky Mountain Collegian as an opinion writer, and he continues to fool the paper into letting him stay around. During the spring of 2021, he worked as an editor for the opinion desk before leaving for Scotland to study abroad for a year. During that time, he wrote for The Saint, the student newspaper at the University of St. Andrews, before returning to Colorado State University as the cannabis desk director. Realistically, Brull knows very little about cannabis or the culture surrounding it but hopes to learn quite a bit in the coming year. Among other responsibilities, he will be responsible for content planning, editing writer contributions and producing content on cannabis policy. He hopes to help in the effort to destigmatize cannabis and its use by focusing the desk on exposure to culture, information and current cannabis policy in the state of Colorado. Brull is currently a student at Colorado State studying political science and philosophy. He hopes in the future to find gainful employment and eventual work-life balance. Current career interests of his include outdoor education and political science academia.

Comments (0)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *