The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
The Importance of Supporting Engineering Education
The Importance of Supporting Engineering Education
February 20, 2024

In today's era of information technology, engineering plays the role of a vanguard, trying to optimize processes and develop new products, making...

Filibuster, now an abuse of power

The filibuster is a parliamentary tactic used to delay legislation by utilizing the unlimited debate time in the Senate. In plain people’s speak, it’s how you talk a bill to death.

The filibuster has historically been a tool for the minority party to block the majority party from running roughshod over their objections to bills. In order to bypass a filibuster, the majority party can invoke cloture, which is another parliamentary rule that allows debate to continue in the event of a filibuster. To successfully invoke cloture, there needs to be a three-fifths vote, or 60 senators.


Now that we’ve got the history out of the way, here’s the problem.

In the past, filibusters have been pretty rare. But, since the Obama administration took the White House, the filibuster has been threatened on just about every issue. In 2009 alone there were 112 calls for a cloture vote to preempt the threat of a filibuster. And now, there is another filibuster underway on the 42nd attempt to defund or otherwise weaken the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare.

There are good filibusters, and there are bad filibusters. When you are standing in opposition to, say, continued drone strikes in the Middle East or in support of women’s health clinics, that’s a good use of the filibuster. But for defunding the ACA, knowing full well that it would never survive a presidential veto? That’s not a good use of the Senate’s time. There are much more pressing issues at hand.

It would be a lot easier to just win the 2016 election, just saying.

View Comments (10)
More to Discover

Hey, thanks for visiting!
We’d like to ask you to please disable your ad blocker when looking at our site — advertising revenue directly supports our student journalists and allows us to bring you more content like this.

Comments (10)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *