The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
How Can Colorado Quarterback Shedeur Sanders Improve For the 2025 NFL Draft?
How Can Colorado Quarterback Shedeur Sanders Improve For the 2025 NFL Draft?
June 6, 2024

Colorado quarterback Shedeur Sanders stands out as a prime prospect for the 2025 NFL Draft, and it’s no surprise he's the current favorite...

Ballot feature: What would be changed due to Proposition 115

Proposition 115 would prohibit abortions after 22 weeks in the state of Colorado. 

Current state laws hold no gestational time limitations or other restrictions. For minors, a two-day notice must be given to parents or guardians unless the patient wishes to obtain a judicial bypass, according to the Colorado’s Parental Notification Law. 


Under Proposition 115, the state law would change so that abortions would no longer be permitted after 22 weeks gestational age.

According to the 2020 State Ballot Information Booklet, sent to all addresses with a registered voter, “Any person who intentionally or recklessly performs or attempts to perform an abortion after 22 weeks gestation would be guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor punishable by a fine of $500 to $5,000.”

The only exceptions allowed by the ballot measure are direct threats to the life of the pregnant person. No exceptions are permitted for cases of rape, incest, the pregnant person’s mental health or fetal abnormalities. 

“If you take away this care, it’s just another thing that they would have to deal with, and it’s not right.”-Kaylin Brooks, CSU political science major

Since 1984, Coloradans have voted on nine ballot measures relating to abortion, such as public funding for abortion services, the classification of a fetus as a person and parental notification requirements for minors seeking abortions.

Proposition 115 is the first, however, to address gestational age restrictions. 

Proposition 115 is the result of a ballot initiative, meaning signatures were collected by co-sponsors Erin Behrens and Giuliana Day and presented to the state government in order for the measure to appear on the ballot.

Argument for Proposition 115

Proponents of the bill argue that passage would “bring Colorado up to speed with the medical and legal status-quo,” as stated in an email to The Collegian by Behrens.

Behrens points to Colorado’s status as only one of seven states, and Washington, D.C., that does not outlaw abortion at any stage, along with New Hampshire, Alaska, New Mexico, Oregon, New Jersey and Vermont. 

Since legalizing abortion in 1967, Colorado has not put in place any restrictions or limitations on abortion,” Behrens explained. “We are an extreme outlier, as 43 other states limit abortion, as does most of the rest of the world. Our citizen’s initiative was created to bring our state in line with modern medical understanding of fetal development.”


Proponents see 115 as a means of recognizing “the dignity of women and the humanity of their unborn children,” as stated in the Blue Book.

Argument against Proposition 115

Proposition 115’s opponents argue that “restricting access to abortion limits a woman’s right to bodily autonomy and interferes with the patient and doctor relationship,” according to the official opposition statement in the Blue Book. 

CSU students Taylor Ziska, Hunter Ridgeway and Kaylin Brooks, who lead the CSU Rams Vote No on 115 campaign, see it as an outright ban that ignores the complexities and unique circumstances of pregnancy. 

“An abortion ban is an abortion ban, no matter what the … ‘exceptions’ (are),” senior Ziska said, referring to the measure’s lack of exceptions for rape or incest victims and non-viable pregnancies. “There are no exceptions in this ban.”

Opponents see 115 as a harmful means of restricting health care disguised as a reasonable compromise.

“I think people … look at it and think, ‘Oh, 22 weeks, that’s enough time for somebody to make up their mind,’” Brooks said. “They’re just not taking in the realities of how everything is so complex, pregnancy is unique and it just puts on so much pressure and hardship for people if we create a ban like that.”

Further, the bill could adversely affect minority groups who already face challenges in accessing health care.

“I am non-binary, and I have a uterus, and a lot of people don’t consider me as someone who desperately needs abortion care as well, and I’m already someone impacted by disproportionate access to health care and reproductive rights,” Ridgeway explained.

Brooks explained that the people who are impacted most are those who are low-income, young, people of color, immigrants and those already “disproportionately hurt in society.”

“If you take away this care, it’s just another thing that they would have to deal with and it’s not right,” Brooks said.

Natalie Weiland can be reached at or on Twitter @natgweiland

Leave a Comment
More to Discover
About the Contributor
Natalie Weiland
Natalie Weiland, News Director
Natalie Weiland is a sophomore political science student with a minor in legal studies and a fierce love of the Oxford comma. Weiland grew up in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and served as an editor for her high school’s yearbook during her senior year. She credits the absolute chaos of the 2016 presidential election for introducing her to — and getting her hooked on — the world of politics and journalism. Her journey with The Collegian started in the fall of her freshman year when she began writing for the news desk.  In her spare time, Weiland enjoys reading and attempting to not have a heart attack every time The New York Times sends a breaking news update to her phone. She has two incredibly adorable dogs (that she will gladly show pictures of if asked) and three less-adorable siblings.  As news director, Weiland's main goal is to ensure that students trust The Collegian to cover stories that are important to and affect them, and she hopes that students are never afraid to reach out and start a conversation. Weiland is excited to see what The Collegian has in store this year and hopes to explore the campus community through reporting. 

Comments (0)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *