The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
The Impact of Technological Innovations on Sports Betting in Colorado: A Primer
The Impact of Technological Innovations on Sports Betting in Colorado: A Primer
April 18, 2024

In the sports betting domain, Colorado stands as a unique arena where technological advancements have significantly reshaped the landscape. As...

NTTF listening session urges committee to ‘evolve faster’

Non-Tenure Track Faculty Equity Week kicked off with a two-hour long discussion about what NTTF want, and they want it now.

At the Committee on Non-Tenure Track Faculty listening session Tuesday, Colorado State University faculty had a conversation about the ongoing problems NTTF face, including job titles and wages.

Ad

CoNTTF is a specialized standing committee of Faculty Council that advises on matters relating to NTTF. In addition to members of CoNTTF at the listening session, there were also non-council faculty members voicing their concerns.

“It feels like we are perpetually stuck in this lower status condition without any way to get our way out of it,” said Pamela Duncan from the political science department.

A grievance brought up multiple times throughout the session mentioned the differences between instructor and professor titles, “which we all know counts for more, even if it’s not pay,” Duncan said.

Duncan went on to say that to gain the professor title, an NTTF instructor needs a specific amount of research. To do the research, an instructor needs a sabbatical, but to get a sabbatical, they need to be on the tenure track.

NTTF are frustrated with the lack of equity because they are not treated the same way TTF are, and Duncan urges the University to “evolve faster.”

Bottom line is we want to do the right thing and make the right changes.” -Dan Bush, vice provost for Faculty Affairs

Many of the NTTF at the listening session reiterated that they feel devalued because they are paid less and subsequently cost less for the University.

“I think (the listening session) was good but not enough,” said Mary Van Buren from the department of anthropology. “We need to get a lot more systematic information about how this transition is going.”

Dan Bush, vice provost for Faculty Affairs, said his hope in the future is to be able to provide living wages, and “if that includes tenure, fine.”

He said his current focus is to “get promotions going and salaries up.”

Ad

Bottom line is we want to do the right thing and make the right changes,” Bush said.

Those who were at the listening session were grateful for the time and the recent changes, but many repeated that more needs to be done for NTTF.

“Having a session like this where we can listen to people who are not directly engaged in faculty council is awesome,” said Jenny Morse, chair for the Committee on NTTF.

The support and University-level changes, which Faculty Council and CoNTTF helped establish, have been good, but many people at the session say it’s just not enough, and they do not receive a living wage.

“My hope is that our concerns are being heard and considered seriously,” Duncan said. “If they are not, the consequences for the University could be very serious. (They could also be serious) for the students; it’s really all about the students.”

Kate Trulson can be reached at news@collegian.com or on Twitter @KateTrulson.

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Comments (0)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *