The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
When Should You Start Writing Your College Essay? 
When Should You Start Writing Your College Essay? 
May 28, 2024

Let's be frank: there's never an ideal moment to craft college essays. At best, there are times that are somewhat less unfavorable. Why is...

Amendment 66 decides future of P-12 education

Colorado voted no on the billion dollar tax increase, Amendment 66, for P-12 education yesterday, but education reform is back to the drawing board.

“I think that Colorado voters very clearly understood that this very extreme measure is not the way we should be doing things,” said Penn Pfiffner, heading the group, Kids Before Unions, in opposition with Amendment 66.


Kids Before Unions, and other groups in opposition were happy with the outcome, especially considering the financial backing for the amendment.

“The proponents spent well in excess of $10 million to market this tax increase to Coloradans and the stunning margins of failure show that never has so much been spent by so few to accomplish so little,” said Kelly Maher, executive director of Compass Colorado, a coalition member of Coloradans for Real Education Reform.

Not all were content with the outcome.

Joann Ginal, Democratic State Representative, who was at Avogadro’s Number last night at an election watch party, was among those upset.

“I think we have to go back to the drawing board and see what happens,” Ginal said. “I’m very disappointed that 66 didn’t pass for children and for our future.”

David Trask, who was voted onto the Poudre School District Board of Education last night, was also at Avo’s, partly in celebration of the passage of 2A and his personal victory, but was also among those disappointed in the outcome.

“When you’re a trustee for a school board, if it passes, you deal with it, if it doesn’t, you deal with it,” Trask said. “You can’t pull money out of a hat. Obviously, they’ll be some bad downsides.”

Many were personally affected by the defeat on 66, including teachers and students in early childhood education.

“I have kiddos who can’t come in full-day because they can’t afford it, and they’re stuck in half-day and then they’re stuck in half-day and not ready for the reading and writing they need to know for kindergarten,” said Sarah Sadler, a kindergarten teacher in Wellington and CSU graduate from 2012, who was hopeful for the benefits 66 would bring to her students.


The issues on the ballot this year all dealt with education and funding. Despite the amendment’s defeat, those for and against are looking for a solution to education funding.

Suzanne Trask, wife and campaign manager to newly elected education board member Trask spoke about the concern.

“It (Amendment 66) was all about about schools, how well they’re doing, that they need more money. David’s line was ‘It would just about bring it back to where the funding would be if we hadn’t had TABOR, and that’s needed,’” Trask said.

Collegian Diversity Beat Reporter Hannah Hemperly can be reached at

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Comments (0)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *