The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
From the Rockies to the Races: Why College Students Are Joining the Celebrity-Packed  Kentucky Derby
From the Rockies to the Races: Why College Students Are Joining the Celebrity-Packed Kentucky Derby
April 24, 2024

The Kentucky Derby, often celebrated as “the most exciting two minutes in sports,” transcends mere horse racing to become a staple of American...

California debates how to properly patrol stoned drivers

Medical marijuana has been legal in California for 10  years, and many activists are pushing for a recreational bill to pass. This leaves officers with the problem of determining whether someone is illegally driving under the influence of marijuana.

Jeff Rosen, district attorney in Santa Clara County, is fighting to pass legislation that will create a standardized legal limit for stoned drivers. According to the Denver Post, the proposed bill would require police officers to prove that a driver is impaired, as well as test for the active ingredient THC in the bloodstream.

Ad

With alcohol it is far easier to determine if a driver is impaired because the substance passes through a person’s body faster, leaving almost no trace when the person is sober. With marijuana, a person may be sober while traces of the active ingredient still remain in the blood.

A survey was released this week by the American Automobile Association’s Traffic Safety Foundation that analyzed DUID arrest data. It concluded that there is no way to accurately check for marijuana impairment from a blood test.

The AAA Foundation recommends that states implement legislation allowing officers to give impairment tests checking for known side effects of marijuana. Such as red eyes or eyelid tremor, followed by a blood test to confirm there is THC in the system.

The struggle to measure intoxication remains, but without a standardized legal limit it is difficult for prosecutors to convict stoned drivers. To read more about the debate, check out the full story.

Collegian Green Report Blogger Capelli D’Angelo can be reached online at blogs@collegian.com.

View Comments (2)
More to Discover

Comments (2)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • D

    Duncan20903May 30, 2016 at 12:45 pm

    A couple of interesting statistics were released at the end of January. In 2015 reported sales of cannabis in Colorado came up $4 million short of $1 billion. That means the State collected $135 million in gross tax revenue. Total gross revenue reported increased by just under 42.5%. That percentage is in dollars, but the average retail price of State authorized cannabis in 2015 was significantly lower than in 2014. Of course that means that the quantity of cannabis distributed was more than a 42.5% increase year over year.

    Reply
    • D

      Duncan20903May 30, 2016 at 12:46 pm

      For 2015 the Colorado State Patrol reports that rather than increasing
      by just under 42.5 percent, the total number of drivers arrested by the
      CSP for being both cannabis addled and under the influence of another
      substance of impairment fell by 1.3 percent from 674 to 665. Drivers
      arrested solely for being cannabis addled also did not increase by just
      under 42.5 percent, but declined just under 2% from 354 to 347.

      The
      total number of DUI arrests made by the CSP was just under 22% higher
      in 2014 than in 2015. Total arrests declined by exactly 1000 from 5,546
      in 2014 to 4,546 in 2015. Where did those 1000 drunk drivers go? Are 20+
      percentage reductions in the number of DUIs year over year commonplace?
      Anywhere in the world?

      Reply