The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
Five Things We Learned Delivering Over Half a Million Orders for NoCo Restaurants
Five Things We Learned Delivering Over Half a Million Orders for NoCo Restaurants
November 8, 2023

  In May 2019, Nosh began as a humble restaurant co-op with just three people. When the pandemic hit in March 2020, while many businesses...

There is too much negativity surrounding Victoria’s Secret Fashion

Women are notorious for putting other women down. This is a perpetual, yet very disappointing phenomenon among the recent movements regarding feminism and women’s empowerment.

The Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show happened last week, and for the first time ever, I heard more negative comments circulating around it than positive — most of these coming from the mouth’s of women. And this is incredibly unfortunate. 


Held each November and airing on national television in December, the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show is a time to feature the company’s latest lingerie designs. Over the years, the event has attracted celebrities, musicians and Hollywood’s A-listers. In fact, many of the models themselves have become celebrities in the process. It has created almost a cult-following, with many of the nation looking forward to the ultra-feminine show.

I’ll be the first to admit that I enjoy this annual event. My friends and I gather in someone’s living room and watch in awe as these tall, svelte women strut down the catwalk in lingerie worth more than our college education.

However, we’re able to watch in a lighthearted fashion because we are aware enough to realize that these models are not an accurate representation of every woman’s body, and that most of our bodies do not resemble theirs. And so we watch the show with a pint of Ben & Jerry’s, without any regrets or feeling the need to throw out the ice cream and hit the gym. 

This is where I see a problem. 

I think that it is fairly normal, in this day and age, to question what “perfection” is. When seeing these models, it’s pretty certain we’re going to be comparing ourselves just a little bit. But at the same time, we seem to be at a point in our culture where we can point out societal flaws — for example, a misrepresentation of women. 

However, to clarify, women who choose to model are not doing anything bad. They simply all share a similar body type — one that represents a very small percentage of women in America. 

I completely understand and can clearly see why many think that this fashion show and these models perpetuate an unrealistic standard for femininity and conventional beauty. And I would also agree that, in a sense, that is exactly what the show is doing. But at the same time, the Victoria’s Secret runway models flaunting their bodies that they have worked hard for — with exercise and healthy eating — are not in the wrong.

One of the criticisms surrounding the show is that it is disempowering to these models, having them wear their underwear in front of a large crowd and a herd of cameras. I would agree that this could be seen as an oppressive and disempowering act, but only if these women were forced to strip down to their underwear and walk in front of a crowd of onlookers and cameras, without having any say themselves.

An article published on Elite Daily in discussed how the Victoria’s Secret fashion show damages girls’ psyches. While reading, this section jumped out at me:


“The models in the VS Fashion Show are virtually viewed as ‘sex objects,’ which is often alluring for women because they want other people to view them as that, as well.”

This statement demonstrates the disturbing idea that women are solely after sexual attention. When it comes to women’s empowerment, this type of thinking is dangerous, especially when it is stated in a derogatory way.

If the roles were reversed and men were modeling underwear in a broadcasted event, there would not be as much of an uproar about it.

To say that these Victoria’s Secret runway models are being objectified and are also objectifying themselves is a disempowering statement in and of itself, by assuming that women lack the conscious choice to model lingerie and whether to reveal their bodies or not. 

If you truly have an issue with the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show, I challenge you to voice your concerns. Speak out, share your opinions or write a letter, asking to see a more diverse range of female body types. 

I speak to my fellow women when I say that whether we disagree with the messages that Victoria’s Secret sends out, we need to understand that simply saying these models are “doing something bad” is ignorant, disrespectful and counterintuitive to women’s empowerment. Part of empowering women is fighting with and for all women — not just the ones we agree with. 

If you see the need for change, be part of the difference. But remember that you cannot bring positivity into a situation with negativity. Bashing on women — no matter who they are — will get you nowhere. 

Collegian columnist Zara DeGroot can be reached at, or on Twitter @zar_degroot

View Comments (10)
More to Discover

Hey, thanks for visiting!
We’d like to ask you to please disable your ad blocker when looking at our site — advertising revenue directly supports our student journalists and allows us to bring you more content like this.

Comments (10)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • S

    SincerelyNov 17, 2015 at 8:36 am

    I agree with you completely, Zara. All too often those who claim to fight for women’s rights neglect or outright censure women whose viewpoints disagree with their own, and as a woman whose views don’t toe the party line, I’m often subject to it. I thought that having equality meant that women can be just as wrong as men, that women can disagree, that women can be separate from the hivemind that seems to be the majority of feminists nowadays. Heck, women can be just as virtuous and just as monstrous as men can be to one another and to others.