The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
African American female student studying from home during lockdown
Pediatric NP Online Programs: Alleviating Gaps in Colorado's Healthcare System
April 10, 2024

In Colorado's intricate healthcare sector, the provision of specialized care to its pediatric population remains a challenge. Pediatric Nurse...

“Free the Nipple” campaign should not be priority for equality movement

Laurel Thompson
Laurel Thompson

Gender equality activists lined the intersection of Mulberry Street and College Avenue Aug. 23 in a Facebook-organized event called “Go Topless Fort Collins 2015,” a local twist on the Free the Nipple campaign recently initiated in New York. The demonstration attracted women and men alike, each flaunting tape-covered or painted breasts and holding satirical posters that criticize Colorado’s public indecency laws.

Although the fundamental issue of gender inequality is represented through these kinds of protests and the demonstrators’ bravery is admirable, the topless campaign might be taking gender inequality too literally.

Ad

First and foremost, the Colorado Criminal Law Guide defines public nudity as a class one misdemeanor on the premise that indecent exposure causes “affront or alarm” to those in proximity. In addition to that, any partial nudity that causes the same discomfort to the public is no exception to the rule and those who disregard it as so are subject to compliance with sex offender charges.

While I do not agree that a woman should be charged as a sex offender for going topless, it is reasonable that she should be held responsible for covering her breasts in public as she would her genitals. To put it simply, there are biological differences between men and women that give women another area to cover in public and I believe that men would also be expected to wear shirts in public if they had breasts. Due to this mere biological difference of the sexes, it is neither sexist nor discriminatory to women that Colorado law prohibits them from going topless in public, and in no way does the law suggest that women should be ashamed of their bodies.

So what about breastfeeding? Does a bra count as a top? What about artistic expression involving nudity? These are the exceptions that deserve discussion and clarification, rather than the general topless debate.

According to the Colorado Public Breastfeeding Law, “A mother may breastfeed in any place she has a right to be,” which is anywhere she is deemed an “invitee,” or a welcomed guest of that environment. A popular example of this is breastfeeding in a restaurant or in the workplace, both of which allow public breastfeeding if the woman has a right to be there and is in no way trespassing.

While going topless for the sake of “doing it because men can” seems a pointless effort to me, I fully support the exception of breast exposure for nursing mothers because the intent is purely maternal and serves a practical function. To be offended by breastfeeding is therefore inherently sexist, as it is unique to women and there is no other foundation for prejudice besides gender. On the other hand, a woman who takes offense to nursing mothers may have a prejudice against motherhood or be embarrassed by the confidence of those who share her gender.

Several other blurred lines regarding toplessness are the use of nudity for artistic expression, and what constitutes a publicly acceptable “top.” For both instances, it is up to the discretion of specific institutions whether toplessness is appropriate, and to what degree.

For example, if a dance or art studio uses nudity to convey a message within its own walls or within the walls of a consenting institution, it is appropriate. If a beach allows nudity and the local government complies, it is appropriate. Hypothetically speaking, if legislature approved topless equality for men and women, the “no shirt, no shoes, no service” rule would still apply to anyone, regardless of gender, within any institution, store or area that enforces it.

As a feminist and a woman, I am a strong advocator for gender equality, yet my distaste for the topless equality campaign is influenced by the more pressing issues I believe take precedence over our inability to go topless.

For instance, the gender pay gap has not shown any significant improvement recently, resulting in women earning a steady 78 cents to a man’s dollar in the same occupation. While this might seem like a small difference to some, it adds up over time to show an exponential difference when comparing a man and a woman’s yearly salary.

Ad

Additionally, women continue to be highly underrepresented in governments, national and worldwide, leading us to have many laws and decisions made for us by a majority male group. We are only fortunate in the U.S. to battle the lack of total equality while women in most developing countries encounter much higher rates of violence, abuse and misogynistic culture. Although predominantly male governments are not necessarily a terrible thing, and I’m not saying that their decisions are always bad or anti-woman, I believe women should have equal representation in their governments and obtain an equal amount of authority as their male counterparts.

Maybe then we would achieve equal pay.

Although there are countless examples of gender inequality to list, these are just a few of the biggest ones. So, to the protesters and those who are distracted by their media coverage, I would encourage a return of focus to the issues that directly impact and discriminate against women in their day-to-day lives. I can say without hesitation that I’d much rather live in a world that promotes equal authority and pay for the sexes than be able to walk my dog topless.

Collegian Columnist Laurel Thompson can be reached at hmcgill@collegian.com or on Twitter @laurelanne1996.

View Comments (15)
More to Discover

Comments (15)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • K

    KCASep 11, 2015 at 8:38 am

    This was a well-framed, well-written article that redirects the attention back onto the issue of gender inequality that really matters; absolutely nothing is accomplished by decriminalizing women of any age or body type to go to the grocery half naked. And even if there were new laws permitting this “choice of expression”, just because you CAN doesn’t mean you SHOULD. Why do women still feel the need to “be like men”. Let’s be BETTER than men, with more class, equal pay, and create change in our societies with our minds and hearts instead of our boobs. Cover up and command respect. The same goes for men; I am not taking ANY guy seriously who is shirtless no matter the environment or circumstance. I think this journalist has it right: we do a disservice to women around the world who are in many cases fighting for thier lives by allowing oureselves to be distracted by trivial protests focusing only on the body that do not lead to fundamental shifts in the balance of power and respect for women.
    Well done. Keep up the great writing.

    Reply
  • K

    KMSep 10, 2015 at 2:52 pm

    You say, “To put it simply, there are biological differences between men and women that give women another area to cover in public and I believe that men would also be expected to wear shirts in public if they had breasts. Due to this mere biological difference of the sexes, it is neither sexist nor discriminatory to women that Colorado law prohibits them from going topless in public…”
    What are these differences- both men and women have nipples, mammary glands, and fatty tissues on their chests?

    I think you’re trivializing the difference in freedom of choice between the sexes. A man and woman sunbathing topless with the same amount of fatty tissue in their breasts would face different outcomes. While the woman could become a sex offender, while the man next to her would have no issues. I agree that feminism has larger fish to fry, but these small differences in treatment make a bigger impact on the way society views women.

    Reply
  • F

    FreeThoughtGuySep 9, 2015 at 4:15 pm

    please educate yourself: 🙂

    Reply