The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
The Impact of Technological Innovations on Sports Betting in Colorado: A Primer
The Impact of Technological Innovations on Sports Betting in Colorado: A Primer
April 18, 2024

In the sports betting domain, Colorado stands as a unique arena where technological advancements have significantly reshaped the landscape. As...

ASCSU campaign: Presidential debate

Editor’s Note: Hannah Taylor works on the Rocky Mountain Student Media Corporation Board of Directors as the alumni coordinator.

Seven candidates for president and vice president of the Associated Students of Colorado State University engaged in the only presidential debate of the election season Wednesday night. 


The ASCSU candidates running on a joint president/vice president ticket include: Adam Pena and Merry Gebretsadik; Jasper Sloss and Mkay Armbrust; Hannah Taylor and Noah Schindler; and Diego Tovar and Rachel Jackson. Armbrust was not present at the debate, as Sloss said he was recovering from a surgery and watching from home.

Throughout the debate, which was Livestreamed on YouTube by CTV Channel 11, candidates hit on the campaign platforms most important to them and questioned the other candidates on the viability of their promises, as well as answered questions sent in by students via YouTube. 

Response to COVID-19

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to disrupt student life — and is the reason the ASCSU elections were postponed — ASCSU’s response was an important topic in the debate.

Taylor and Schindler said their first campaign platform that they plan to prioritize is the creation of a COVID-19 relief fund. 

“We’d have to work with other departments at CSU to collect those funds and then donate them to the CSU financial aid office where they are able to disperse those funds to students in need right now,” Taylor said.

Taylor said they would also create a committee that would hand out masks, hand sanitizer and thermometers to students so they can accurately fill out the daily symptom checker.

Sloss touched on his platform to ensure that students are safe on campus and said he served on a social-norming task force to create health messaging for students. Sloss said that providing appropriate messaging and engagement with students about COVID-19 safety concerns is vital in maintaining student safety. 

In addition to safety during COVID-19, candidates discussed ways they would engage the students in a virtual environment. 

Tovar said that he and Jackson have done this already as the respective president and vice president for Minorities in Agriculture, Natural Resources and Related Sciences


“We’re not going to hide in our office and pretend that we’re not a part of the student community. We’re going to be out there, and we’re going to be involved,” Tovar said.

Pena said he and Gebretsadik already have plans to hold biweekly meetings between the president and vice president of ASCSU and students “so you can feel your voices are heard.” 

Diversity, inclusion and hate speech on campus

Tovar and Jackson reiterated throughout the debate that one of their key campaign platforms is belonging on campus. Tovar said that the first thing they plan to do when elected is to work with CSU students to create a definition of hate speech and a plan of education for those who violate that definition, which would be in the student code of conduct.

Other candidates expressed issues with this idea, voicing concerns over the violations this might present to students’ first amendment rights.

“We have a problem with the culture that we’ve created on campus,” Taylor said. “And there does need to be a solution for that. But I would say that running on the idea that you are going to outlaw, by the code of conduct, certain words, but not create an actual list of those words … isn’t being fully transparent to students.”

Tovar said he disagrees, because “you need student involvement to create a student code of conduct.” 

Sloss said that he and Armbrust believe the community should stand for certain values and that a revision of the code of ethics and the code of conduct is a great way to reinforce those ideals. 

“To Diego Tovar, enforcing hate speech sounds like you intend to then punish those (who) have violated the policies you will create,” Sloss said.

Sloss questioned if this was within Tovar’s power to do and how he would do that as a fellow student. 

“We’re not out here to punish anyone,” Tovar said. “It’s about education. We’re an institution of education, and it’s about understanding bias and discrimination is a real issue on our campus, and it needs to be addressed.” 

Later on in the debate when the question of hate speech was brought up again, Pena added, “We are for freedom of speech, but we are not for speech that incites people to violence, and we are not for slander, we are not for libel, and that is where we stand on that issue.”

ASCSU voting opens on RAMweb Sept. 14 and will continue through 4 p.m. Sept. 16.

Serena Bettis can be reached at or on Twitter @serenaroseb.

Leave a Comment
More to Discover
About the Contributor
Serena Bettis
Serena Bettis, Editor in Chief
Serena Bettis is your 2022-23 editor in chief and is in her final year studying journalism and political science. In her three years at The Collegian, Bettis has also been a news reporter, copy editor, news editor and content managing editor, and she occasionally takes photos, too. When Bettis was 5, her family moved from Iowa to a tiny town northwest of Fort Collins called Livermore, Colorado, before eventually moving to Fort Collins proper. When she was 8 years old, her dad enrolled at Colorado State University as a nontraditional student veteran, where he found his life's passion in photojournalism. Although Bettis' own passion for journalism did not stem directly from her dad, his time at CSU and with The Collegian gave her the motivation to bite down on her fear of talking to strangers and find The Collegian newsroom on the second day of classes in 2019. She's never looked back since. Considering that aforementioned fear, Bettis is constantly surprised to be where she is today. However, thanks to the supportive learning environment at The Collegian and inspiring peers, Bettis has not stopped chasing her teenage dream of being a professional journalist. Between working with her section editors, coordinating news stories between Rocky Mountain Student Media departments and coaching new reporters, Bettis gets to live that dream every day. When she's not in the newsroom or almost falling asleep in class, you can find Bettis working in the Durrell Marketplace and Café or outside gazing at the beauty that is our campus (and running inside when bees are nearby). This year, Bettis' goals for The Collegian include continuing its trajectory as a unique alt-weekly newspaper, documenting the institutional memory of the paper to benefit students in years to come and fostering a sense of community and growth both inside the newsroom and through The Collegian's published work. Bettis would like to encourage anyone with story ideas, suggestions, questions, concerns or comments to reach out to her at

Comments (0)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *