The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
When Should You Start Writing Your College Essay? 
When Should You Start Writing Your College Essay? 
May 28, 2024

Let's be frank: there's never an ideal moment to craft college essays. At best, there are times that are somewhat less unfavorable. Why is...

The state of “Better Call Saul”

Traffic accident? Better call Saul. Injured on the job? Call now. Just confessed to a homicide? What are you waiting for? Need a new show to watch before “House of Cards” and “Game of Thrones” air again? “Better Call Saul.”

“Better Call Saul” is a spinoff of the glorious “Breaking Bad,” starring Bob Odenkirk as the corrupt lawyer James McGill, a.k.a. Saul Goodman. The show premiered three weeks ago, and the everyone is wondering whether or not the show can hold its own against its predecessor.


The short answer is yes, absolutely, completely yes.

After watching the first four episodes, I feel as if its almost insulting to compare “Better Call Saul” to “Breaking Bad” because “Saul” has proven itself to be independent and new.

The show takes place six years prior to the events of “Breaking Bad,” making any major mixing of the two impossible.

Though operating in the same universe as “Breaking Bad,” this show has a completely different tone, rhythm and overall feel. Saul’s story is so different from Walter or Jesse’s, who have not been mentioned yet at all, by the way.

In my opinion, Saul is a just as, if not more of an interesting character than Walter and Jesse. Since the show revolves around just him, much more attention is given to him and his backstory. A courtroom drama mixed with the crime drama of “Breaking Bad” is incredibly refreshing.

Odenkirk stars as Saul, and brings a really unprecedented amount of life to his character. Saul is relatable, funny and surprisingly intelligent.

The directing and editing style of the digitally shot “Saul” is new and fantastic (“Breaking Bad” was shot on 35mm film for a vintage look).

Temporal and situational cuts are done with extreme precision and care. For example, flashbacks are connected by match cuts on the same objects or people in different times. For those who don’t know editing lingo, match cuts are like candy to editors. The feeling of a good match cut is comparable to your favorite team in a football game getting an interception.


The general editing is tight and neat, which just makes the show feel so polished and much more organized than the handheld style of “Breaking Bad.” Most of the major crew members joined in from the original show, resulting in the same aesthetic, but with writing that creates an entirely new story.

Film buffs will love the show, as characters recite several old film references every episode, including nods to “Duck Soup,” “The Shining,” “Cabaret,” “The Thing” and “Spartacus.”

If you don’t believe me, the data speaks for itself. The show is rated at a 9.4 on IMDb, just one tenth of a point lower than “Breaking Bad,” which had a rough beginning. So far, “Saul” has an average of four million viewers a week.

What’s surprising to most people is that “Breaking Bad” took five and a half seasons to reach those numbers, meaning it was actually in danger of being cancelled in its infancy.

“Saul” has a bright future. And, just for fun, check out Saul Goodman’s website. It’s a real thing.

Collegian A&E Writer Morgan Smith can be reached at or on Twitter @MDSFilms.

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Comments (0)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *