The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
The Impact of Technological Innovations on Sports Betting in Colorado: A Primer
The Impact of Technological Innovations on Sports Betting in Colorado: A Primer
April 18, 2024

In the sports betting domain, Colorado stands as a unique arena where technological advancements have significantly reshaped the landscape. As...

Cooke: Board of Governor’s decision contradicts University’s values

barbed-wire fence in front of the Hughes Stadium development site
Fences surround the Hughes Stadium development site currently closed off to the public Feb. 2. (Cat Blouch | The Collegian)

Editor’s Note: All opinion section content reflects the views of the individual author only and does not represent a stance taken by The Collegian or its editorial board.

The Hughes Land Back initiative is an alliance of Indigenous locals aiming to regain stewardship of the land that used to be Hughes Stadium, currently owned by Colorado State University.


In a statement released by the CSU System Board of Governors, the board declined to meet the initiative’s requests, describing the proposal as “inconsistent with the board’s duties.”

The board’s decision on this issue directly contradicts our Principles of Community, reflects a lack of historical consideration and gives all CSU students a reason to not be proud of this institution.

I’ve written about Hughes in the past, and I admit that my opinions were based on a shortage of knowledge and context surrounding this issue. After speaking with members of the land back initiative, I am reversing my previous stances.

A person adjusts a sign
Christinia Eala, an activist for Native American rights, adjusts a sign at the Intertribal Alliance for Right Relations Aug. 22. Eala and others spoke with students attending an event to hike to “The A” about their hope that the Hughes Stadium site could be used as a gathering place for Indigenous people. (Ryan Schmidt | The Collegian)

According to the initiative’s website, CSU did not receive “free, prior and informed consent” from Native people before planning the Hughes development. The board’s failure to work with Indigenous leaders on this issue blatantly violates our principles of inclusion, integrity and respect. If CSU was truly inclusive and acted with integrity and respect, Indigenous voices would have been central to discussion from the beginning.

Turning the land over to Indigenous stewardship would only extend the decision-making power to groups who have historically been left out of these conversations. Such action would speak more to inclusion and respect than the board’s performative rhetoric to “(continue) the conversation thoughtfully and to continue to listen, learn and adapt.”

Richard Williams, who is Oglala Lakota and Northern Cheyenne, believes CSU has an obligation to do right by Natives in Colorado.

“(Hughes is) the first opportunity for the University to step up and do the right thing and begin the process of healing,” Williams said. He added that the 161-acre lot could be kept open to everyone, saying, “We don’t want to live separately.”

The initiative has repeatedly emphasized that they share the University’s concerns over sustainability and equity in Fort Collins’ future. According to a press release shared with The Collegian via email, “intertribal leaders have suggested using the land for purposes that align with both the citizens’ will to keep it open space and the (City of Fort Collins’) Our Climate Future Plan.”

True reconciliation can never come with ‘economic benefit.’ Reconciliation is not supposed to benefit those who have already benefited for centuries.”

For example, at a Land Back public event on July 24, Williams proposed subterranean living as a way to provide energy-efficient housing while preserving the grassland. Several individuals within the initiative mentioned plans for native food and medicine gardens using traditional ecological methods, emphasizing long-term considerations for development and “seven-generations sustainability practices.”


While subterranean housing isn’t an explicitly outlined goal for the initiative, ambitious ideas such as these align with CSU’s reputation for sustainability, but CSU has failed to bring Indigenous perspectives to the table because the University is not considering the full weight of history.

The story of the United States, and Colorado, is a story of genocide. American history stands on the murdered and erased history of an entire continent. This absence is so overwhelming in the present that reconciliation can sometimes seem impossible. How could anything ever reconcile such a horrific past?

That is why it’s imperative to listen to Indigenous voices now. But the board’s statement completely brushes over this history: “Discussion around land stewardship is important across the United States, yet singling out Hughes as unique because of CSU’s Land Grant history is not an accurate representation of this parcel’s history.”

Just a reminder: This entire continent was stolen, including the 161-acre Hughes plot. The board’s statement flagrantly contradicts CSU’s Land Acknowledgment and demonstrates that economics, not our Principles of Community, govern the board’s decisions.

A person walks past a sign that reads "THIS IS STOLEN LAND"
A sign at the Intertribal Alliance for Right Relations for Hughes Land Back Aug. 22. Although Colorado State University currently plans to develop the Hughes Stadium land, activists envision it being used as a gathering place for Indigenous people. (Ryan Schmidt | The Collegian)

According to the statement, “disposing of such an asset (Hughes) without economic benefit is inconsistent with the board’s duties.” True reconciliation can never come with “economic benefit.” Reconciliation is not supposed to benefit those who have already benefited for centuries. Or should we add an “economic benefit” clause to CSU’s social justice Principle of Community?

Criticisms aside, our University has a profound opportunity at its fingertips. CSU can restore land to Indigenous stewardship and “begin the process of healing” without jeopardizing its original goals. We can also encourage other land-grant universities across the nation to follow our example, kickstarting a continental movement that, for the first time in our history, welcomes the perspectives of those who have been left out for too long.

Rams take care, and Rams take action. Let the University know that its performative actions are hypocritical. To echo the Hughes initiative, tell CSU and its Board of Governors to “take the next step: Move from land acknowledgment to land action and land back.”

Cody Cooke can be reached at or on Twitter @CodyCooke17.

Leave a Comment
More to Discover
About the Contributor
Cody Cooke
Cody Cooke, Opinion Director
Cody Cooke is the director of the opinion desk for The Collegian and has worked for the newspaper since December 2019. He is a senior studying English and history with a concentration in creative writing. Cooke joined the opinion desk as a consistent way to sharpen his writing and to get involved with other student writers. He began as a columnist and remained a regular writer for more than a year before moving into his director position. He sees opinion writing as a rich and important combination of argumentation and journalism — a way to present facts that goes beyond objective reporting and makes a point. He also sees it as one of the most accessible platforms for any writer to start building a career. Working at The Collegian has taught him to be accountable and responsible for his own work while being proud of creating something worth sharing to a large audience. While not always easy, Cooke's time at The Collegian has been one of the most constructive and satisfying experiences of his collegiate career. 

Comments (0)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *