The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
Innovative Startups to Watch in the Tech Industry
July 19, 2024

The tech industry is ever-evolving, with startups continually pushing the boundaries of innovation. In 2024, several companies are making waves...

LTTE: CSU’s athletic program is not profitable

Editor’s Note: All opinion section content reflects the views of the individual author only and does not represent a stance taken by The Collegian or its editorial board. Letters to the Editor reflect the view of a member of the campus community and are submitted to the publication for approval.

To the Editor:

Ad

The cover story “Stadium rakes in $3.2 million…” published on Sept. 16, 2019, creates the impression that the athletic program is a profitable enterprise at Colorado State University. The truth is exactly the opposite.

In the 2018 fiscal year, athletics required $6 million in student fees and $20 million in institutional support in order to cover its losses, according to CSU’s report to the NCAA. These subsidies drive up the cost of college attendance and divert resources that could otherwise be used to support education. 

Athletics is fun and worthwhile (except for football), but it is a profound mistake to treat it as more important than education.

Over the past decade, CSU has spent more and more on athletics, especially football. All it has to show for it is a losing team, lackluster attendance at home games and an athletic program deficit that grows larger every year.

The CSU administration has always argued that its deficit spending on athletics makes sense because of its “intangible benefits” such as national visibility. But there is no evidence to back up these vague claims. It is hard to believe that anyone decides to apply to CSU because they watch a football game on TV. If that is their motivation, why would they come to CSU when they can go to Oklahoma or Alabama? 

Football is an enormously expensive sport. Only the top college teams are able to earn enough income to pay their own way. CSU is never going to be in that league no matter how much money we throw at it.

Athletics is fun and worthwhile (except for football), but it is a profound mistake to treat it as more important than education. Reducing the cost of education and increasing the resources we put into it are more important than subsidizing the entertainment of football fans. That is the story The Collegian should be telling.

Prof. Steven Shulman

Department of economics

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Comments (0)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *