The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
Cutting Edge Online Payment Technologies in 2024
April 16, 2024

Businesses worldwide are quickly embracing advanced payment methods to stay ahead in the tight market competition. These methods not only...

Spease: Liberal protesters at Yiannopoulos’ event prove they are anything but tolerant

The views expressed in the following column are those of the writer only and do not necessarily represent the views of the Collegian or its editorial board.

“Move along fuck boy” “you have betrayed your own race” these are just a few of the vulgar statements shouted by protesters lingering outside CU’s math building, where the controversial speaker Milo Yiannopoulos held his event. These protesters lined the grass behind a row of police officers and were strewn in all black, wearing gas masks, bandannas, and combat boots. They were hoisting all black flags and signs with sayings such as “Queer Rage” and “Punch Nazis” and continually chanted, “No Trump. No KKK. No fascist USA”. In contrast, a small coalition of conservative students were holding a counter demonstration no more than five feet away. They were wearing make “America Great Again” hats, and holding signs proclaiming, “Trump IS your president” and “taxation is theft” while chanting “U.S.A”.

Ad

Although seemingly civil at first, the protest soon turned hostile when a male in all black holding an “ANTIFA” poster began yelling at police officers that they were protecting fascist, racist, sexist, homophobes, while using intimidation. The protester continually, and rhetorically, asked “Who are you protecting?” This incited a response from counter protesters who chanted, “blue lives matter” and debates blew up across the crowd. Juan Caro and Sarah Bruce from Conservative Interest Group and Caucus of Colorado, were repeatedly targeted by these protesters. Caro stood amid a group of protesters holding a sign saying “Liberals Stole 3 of our signs, and 50% of our income”, the sign was violently ripped out of his hands after three previous posters had been torn, and the crowd swarmed him. Bruce was not holding any signs, and were only responding to reporters, yet had her hair pulled and protesters began to chant, “cry white girl, cry!” I walked into the protesters’ crowd trying to get anyone to talk to me, and when I asked my first question a man responded “fuck you and the media” and flipped me off, followed by girls shouting “they are so fucking stupid” and I was immediately pushed back into the line of police officers.

The protestors linked arms and began walking forward towards the event center pushing back officers and conservative demonstrators. Attendees of Yiannopoulos’ lecture had to be escorted into the building by officers, could not bring any bags, were required to walk through metal detectors, along with various other security measures. Minutes after the lecture began ticket holders to the event had their email addresses leaked, and received a message stating “We know who you are, tonight we will know your faces. The identities of attendees will be released to the public on a list of known Neo-Nazi sympathizers. We do not tolerate fascists.”

Boulder police and SWAT were on the scene in riot gear escorting people out of the building following the speech as protesters shouted, “get the red hats!” as they stalked attendees. Never in my life have I been truly frightened for my life until then. Although it was not nearly as serious as the protest at UW where bricks were thrown and someone was shot, or at UCLA where attendees had to be evacuated because of a bomb threat. This experience was still hostile, violent, yet eye-opening. Hundreds of people came to this event to protest Yiannopoulos, because they said he made students feel unsafe, their rights were going to be taken away, and because the speaker did not reflect their values. These protesters were so convinced that they were right that they would shout over anyone who tried to engage them in discussion.

That’s when it dawned on me, these people do not want open discussion or free speech. Nor do they care that it is a first amendment right violation to ban Milo Yiannopoulos from speaking on campus. The only thing these protesters want is to shove their liberal ideals down the throats of anyone who will listen, and the minute a counter view or diverse opinion is shared they blow up. They use ad hominems to try and demonize conservatives instead of debating. Instead of welcoming diverse thought and speakers onto campus, they try and ban anyone who does not agree with mainstream leftist thought. These protesters use safe spaces and cry sessions as a way to coddle each other and insulate themselves from diverse beliefs. They do not debate; they attack and then retreat and hide.

In addition to intolerant protesting they use violent rhetoric and undignified signs and behavior to spread their views. Yelling at police officers, dressing up in gas masks, and holding posters full of ad hominems is not going to convince conservatives and libertarians to change their views. Protesters lecture people about spreading kindness and acceptance, while they spew hatred and violence. In order to rally people behind a cause they have to use rational means and welcoming actions. By yelling and insulting people you will not change their views, it will only fuel their hatred and isolate them further in the opposite direction. Using violent protest, while insulting anyone with an opposing view, and banning discussion is the last way to spread tolerance and create a following; the protest at Milo Yiannopoulos’ event proves this.

View Comments (7)
More to Discover

Comments (7)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • M

    Mary McDonaldFeb 2, 2017 at 9:00 am

    In the interests of Free Speech and constructive dialogue, why doesn’t UC Berkely invite Milo Yiannopoulos to speak along with equally outspoken groups that present an opposite view. There are many to choose from.

    Reply
  • F

    face4Feb 1, 2017 at 5:28 pm

    I was there and protesting and peacefully so, like many others. There were some more aggressive protesters, and before the talk started inside the building, there were some aggressive counterprotesters, one of whom continually threw himself into others with his phone recording his attempt to get punched by someone so he could post it online, I assume–and two men in suits who I assume were the speaker’s bodyguards, who approached the most vocal protesters while happening to allow their firearms to become visible, which seemed unnecessarily dangerous and provocative to me. It was everything from peaceful and productive (I had multiple good conversations with people I didn’t know and we just talked about the implications of free speech protections, hate speech, etc.) to sometimes violent, and that was not only on one side. I personally heard more than one person endorse white nationalism very self-consciously and confidently. So, on the whole, it was a snapshot of humanity right now. Some peaceful, with messages of wanting inclusion and peaceful dialogue. Some trying to provoke violence. Some on both sides very obviously hating and trying to intimidate the other. I wouldn’t say it was pretty.

    Reply
  • K

    KennyJan 31, 2017 at 8:53 am

    This is absolutely terrible. I’m glad to hear that you came back mostly unscathed. As a liberal, I am always ashamed to hear this. I’m a big believer in protests but I draw the line at riots.
    I get that liberals are as angry now with the electoral process as Republicans say they have been with it, but this is never the way to show it.

    On a side note I have to ask – do you truly believe that taxation is theft?

    Reply
  • H

    Haley DallasJan 26, 2017 at 12:57 pm

    This piece is rife with inaccuracies. Would like the Collegian to at least post a contrasting viewpoint (besides the non-opinion article also featured in today’s paper), if they are going to let this kind of unfounded journalism run.

    Reply
    • A

      AustinJan 26, 2017 at 1:22 pm

      I mean… I was there and this is pretty accurate…

      Reply
      • H

        Haley DallasJan 26, 2017 at 1:53 pm

        So was I. I’m not referencing personal experiences at the event since that’s highly subjective, but the political terminology used, and the context given.

        Reply
    • A

      Alex SmithJan 27, 2017 at 12:53 pm

      I’m almost certain they haven’t posted a counterpoint one because they weren’t sent one. Op-ed articles in any paper don’t usually come complete with opposing ideas from someone else. So if you were to write a response I’m almost positive they would publish it, too.

      Reply