The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
How to Increase eCommerce Sales with SEO
How to Increase eCommerce Sales with SEO
February 28, 2024

With the development of the online shopping market, SEO has become a crucial factor in driving targeted traffic and increasing sales. Effective...

Both ASCSU campaigns ineligible, Pineda Soracá will still take office

According to a decision by the Associated Students of Colorado State University Supreme Court, both campaigns for the ASCSU presidency were in violation of the ASCSU Constitution throughout the election process. However, the court will allow President-Elect Pineda Soracá and Vice President Elect Mike Lensky to assume office.

The decision is in response to an appeal filed by current ASCSU President Jason Sydoriak. 


Current Deputy Chief of Staff Ashley Higgins and running mate Steven Losolla ran against Pineda Soracá as the only opposition. In a close race with low voter turn out, Pineda Soracá narrowly won the presidency by 22 votes. 

Syroriak filed the appeal two days after the election, on the grounds that Pineda Soracá should not be considered a single ticket, and therefore should not have been placed as a name on the ballot. 

According to the court’s decision today, a single ticket campaign must meet the following criteria:

  1. The candidate’s application must have been received by the Elections Manager no later than 3 p.m. on the Friday of the week prior to Spring Break.
  2. The candidate must have attended an orientation session by 4 p.m. on the Friday immediately prior to Spring Break.
  3. The candidate must meet the eligibility requirements stated in Article VII, Section 703 of the ASCSU Constitution.

Sydoriak argued that the Pineda Soracá campaign did not meet the orientation deadline or the application deadline, because Pineda Soracá picked up a new running mate after both. Pineda Soracá’s first running mate was deemed ineligible due to a grade point average requirement, so the campaign added Lensky to the ticket. During the meeting with the court, Pineda Soracá said that members of the elections committee informed her that she was allowed to add a new running mate. 

However, the court decided that the Higgins campaign was also in violation of single ticket procedure, because, due to a medical emergency, neither campaign completed orientation by the 4 p.m. Friday deadline. 

“Despite what some might describe as extenuating circumstances, the Court found no reason why orientation sessions could not have been held earlier in the week or even semester,” the court decision stated.

Though both campaigns were ruled ineligible today, the court did not assign fault to any individual, rather the court found “systematic negligence…by ASCSU as a whole.”

“With both campaigns operating under the same neglect, neither side held an inherent advantage in the process,” the court decision stated.

The ASCSU Supreme court will allow Pineda Soracá and Lensky to take office as normal.


“We must validate the student’s vote, yielding to the collective voice of our constituents,” the court decision stated. “To disregard their input, their trust, or their financial support, would be a greater injustice than any elections violation.”

Collegian reporter Erin Douglas can be reached at or on twitter @erinmdouglas23.

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Hey, thanks for visiting!
We’d like to ask you to please disable your ad blocker when looking at our site — advertising revenue directly supports our student journalists and allows us to bring you more content like this.

Comments (0)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *