The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
Lando Norris in Miami. Accident win or the birth of a new star?
May 17, 2024

  On May 5, 2024, an essential event for Formula 1 occurred in Miami. One of the favorites of the world public, the Briton Lando...

Clinton, Sanders connect to dems at 83rd CO Democratic Annual Dinner

[new_royalslider id=”450″]

Photos by Abbie Parr.

Ad

DENVER — With Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders coming off an energetic rally at the Colorado Convention Center and with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s supporters rallying just outside the door, the Colorado Democrats 83rd Annual Dinner Saturday became a battleground for the heart of Colorado Democrats. By the time the two candidates left the stage, Clinton had successfully highlighted Colorado issues while Sanders was unable to localize his platform.

The dinner was key in influencing Colorado Democrats to lean one way or the other on the two leading candidates for the 2016 democratic party presidential nomination.

Clinton, Sanders and Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley were all invited to attend the dinner, held at the Sheraton Downtown Denver Hotel, but only Clinton and Sanders confirmed their attendance as keynote speakers. According to one member of catering staff for the event, the Sheraton ballroom was able to seat 1,510 guests, and it was estimated that about 1,350 guests showed up to the dinner.

Colorado Democratic Party Chair Rick Palacio said it was the highest-ever attendance for a Colorado Democratic Annual Dinner.

Ad Nauseum

Both candidates spoke on a wide range of issues, including the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia that had occurred just hours before. After thanking Gabby Giffords and Mark Kelly for their work against gun violence, Clinton called Republicans out, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, for wanting to block any nominations President Obama would put forth for Scalia’s replacement. 

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders waves to a crowd of more than 1,300 Colorado democrats. Sanders spoke on healthcare reform, the youth influence, taking Wal-Mart off of "government welfare" and the need to end political corruption. (Photo Credit: Abbie Parr)
Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders waves to a crowd of more than 1,300 Colorado Democrats. Sanders spoke on healthcare reform, the youth influence, taking Wal-Mart off of “government welfare” and the need to end political corruption. (Photo credit: Abbie Parr.)

Sanders spoke along the same lines, arguing that the Supreme Court is meant to have nine members, not eight. 

The two candidates seemed to agree on most issues for the rest of the night. Both Clinton and Sanders said Obama had not received enough praise for his accomplishments as president, that they would deal with wealth and income inequality if elected and that they would work to remove money from influencing politics. Both also agreed, almost word for word, that healthcare is “a right of all people, not a privilege,” a line repeated ad nauseum by both campaigns.

Where the speeches differed was in how they connected specifically with Colorado democrats.

Ad

Connecting to Colorado

Sanders made only two comments on Colorado in his 28-minute long keynote speech; one was a statement that “people are going to be very surprised by election results here in Colorado,” while the other referenced Colorado’s recent legalization of recreational marijuana.

Sanders more-or-less stuck to his script and didn’t stray far from his national platform. 

Clinton began her speech by calling for the re-election of Sen. Michael Bennet and for more Democrats to be elected into local and state government. She argued that the Colorado FAMLI Act, which would have established a statewide family medical leave plan, would have passed if Colorado Republicans had not blocked the bill. 

In a statement of support for Planned Parenthood, Clinton said “the planned parenthood shooter should have never had that gun in the first place,” connecting her national gun control platform with the recent shooting in Colorado Springs. 

Clinton also said auto companies had taken advantage of the automotive bailout. She said Johnson Controls Inc., an auto parts corporation with offices in both Denver and Fort Collins, has “turned it’s back on America,” and argued that its use of bailout funds was a “perversion.” 

Clinton vs Sanders

Throughout the speeches, neither candidate called the other out by name but did not hesitate to make indirect throws at one another.

Clinton said, repeating her closing remarks at the sixth democratic debate, that she “is not a single-issue candidate” and that Democrats need to choose someone who, “you count on to break down every barrier, not just some.”

“We need real solutions to the problems we face,” Clinton said. “I’m not making promises I can’t keep.”

Sanders, on the other hand, said, “I do not have a super PAC. I do not want a super PAC.” He stated that his campaign had received over $3.5 million in contributions during his nine-month run for the Democratic nomination, averaging at $27 apiece. Clinton has faced much scrutiny in an election cycle where accepting Wall Street campaign donations has been as poisonous as saying, “I am the establishment.”

In reference to beliefs that Clinton is inconsistent in her campaign platform, Sanders said, on the topic of a corrupt political financing system, “You can spin all you want, you can change your views all you want, but that is the reality of American society.”

Capturing the West

After Clinton won the Iowa Caucuses and Sanders took New Hampshire by a landslide, the two candidates are neck-and-neck going into the Nevada and Colorado caucuses.

In the most recent poll by TargetPoint conducted from Feb. 8-10, Sanders and Clinton are tied at 45 points each among likely Nevada Democratic caucus voters, with 9 undecided voters. The Nevada Democratic caucuses will take place Feb. 20, the same day as the South Carolina caucuses where Clinton holds an average +32.3 point lead over Sanders, according to RealClearPolitics.com.

If Sanders wants to have the best chance at getting the Democratic presidential nomination, he must close this gap by taking a step down from national politics and learning to play at the state level like his challenger for the Democratic presidential nomination.

The candidate who takes Nevada will send a clear message to other western states as to who best represents western ideals and issues such as race, energy, immigration and education. The Colorado Democratic caucus will take place March 1, alongside 10 other U.S. states on Super Tuesday.

Collegian Assistant News Editor Erik Petrovich can be reached at news@collegian.com or via Twitter @EAPetrovich.

View Comments (8)
More to Discover

Comments (8)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • D

    disqus_TpAzUQhCeOFeb 14, 2016 at 8:07 pm

    C’mon, guys. I’m kind of shocked that the Collegian would publish a “news” article that is so unapologetically opinionated and lacking background information. Maybe Hillary did “win” the dinner, but why are you telling readers that at the end of the first paragraph? Let them decide for themselves and give them objective information. Is this column? This entire piece is littered with bias. Also, what is a caucus? Why is the caucus in Colorado one CSU students should be concerned about? I can’t say I’m impressed with this coverage.

    Reply
  • K

    KWFeb 14, 2016 at 7:48 pm

    Ok guys, get it together. I’m kind of shocked that the assistant news editor of the Collegian would write a “news” article that is so unapologetically opinionated, biased, and lacking background information. Maybe Hillary did “win” the dinner, but why are you telling readers that at the end of the first graph? Let them decide for themselves by giving your audience objective information. Also, what is a caucus? Why is the caucus in Colorado one CSU students should be concerned about? I can’t say I’m impressed with this coverage.

    Reply