The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
The Impact of Technological Innovations on Sports Betting in Colorado: A Primer
The Impact of Technological Innovations on Sports Betting in Colorado: A Primer
April 18, 2024

In the sports betting domain, Colorado stands as a unique arena where technological advancements have significantly reshaped the landscape. As...

UVA alumni sue Rolling Stone over discredited rape story

A protestor stands outside the Phi Kappa Psi chapter house at the University of Virginia. (Photo Courtesy: Wikipedia)
A protestor stands outside the Phi Kappa Psi chapter house at the University of Virginia. (Photo Courtesy: Wikipedia)

Three members of a University of Virginia fraternity have filed a defamation suit against Rolling Stone after the magazine published a widely read, and later discredited, article alleging a sexual assault in their fraternity house, according to court papers made public on Wednesday.

George Elias IV, Stephen Hadford and Ross Fowler filed the suit in federal court in Manhattan, New York, on Wednesday, naming Rolling Stone, publisher Wenner Media and the article’s author as defendants.


The article drew international attention, and although it did not name any of the defendants, the plaintiffs’ names and hometowns were published on “online blogs by anonymous users, identifying plaintiffs as the participants in the alleged gang rape,” according to the suit.

“Not surprisingly, these claims had a devastating effect on each of the plaintiffs’ reputations,” the suit says.

Elias, Hadford and Fowler were members of Phi Kappa Psi, the fraternity at the center of Sabrina Rubin Erdely’s controversial November 2014 article, “A Rape on Campus: A Brutal Assault and Struggle for Justice at UVA.” All three men graduated in 2013, according to the suit.

The article attempted to depict a culture of sexual misconduct on American college campuses by portraying the gang rape of a young woman referred to as “Jackie” at the fraternity house in Charlottesville, Va.

The opening of the article described the purported assault as a Phi Kappa Psi initiation rite. It said seven fraternity brothers and rushes mauled Jackie, taking turns assaulting her over the course of three hours after she was slammed through a glass table.

Nearly 3 million people read the article online, according to the suit.

Rolling Stone retracted the story in April, after other media outlets found that several key details about the alleged assault could not be corroborated.

The Columbia Journalism Review found several lapses in Erdely’s reporting, chief among them her decision to honor “Jackie’s” request that Erdely not try to contact the alleged attackers.

Other major details of the story also unraveled. The fraternity would later prove it did not host a social event the night “Jackie” said she was attacked.


The Charlottesville Police Department launched its own investigation into the alleged assault, saying in March that detectives could not find evidence that a rape had occurred.

The suit filed Wednesday also contends that Erdely’s description made it easy for friends, family members and other journalists to question the plaintiffs and consider them suspects. According to the suit, Elias lived in the fraternity house, and many believed his bedroom was the location of the purported assault.

The plaintiffs were linked to the story on, a message board where users discuss events at the university and the surrounding area, according to the suit. A search of their names on the message board can easily point to a thread titled “Culture of Rape at UVA profiled in Rolling Stone,” which was launched shortly after Erdely’s article was published.

Wednesday’s suit is not the first to be lobbed at Rolling Stone after the article’s publication. Nicole Eramo, the university’s associate dean of students, filed a defamation suit against the magazine and Erdely in May.

Briefs Courtesy of the Tribune News Service

View Comments (6)
More to Discover

Comments (6)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • C

    Charles HoffmannAug 25, 2015 at 1:53 pm

    I did a quick search and the only post in the “Culture of Rape at UVA profiled in Rolling Stone” thread that contains the plaintiff’s names (George Elias, Stephen Hadford, and Ross Fowler) is the one at from the user “Rugby Road Rooster”, which is just a list of Virginia Alpha chapter members of Phi Kappa Psi, and was likely copied from some other source on the Internet.

    Now, it’s possible that there was another post on FFXU that accused Elias, Hadford, and/or Fowler more explicitly that has since been sent down the memory hole by Cary Wiedemann, the forum’s proprietor. It’s also possible the mere publication of their names in the thread creates guilt by association in the mind of the reader, but this seems tenuous.

    Much worse accusations that explicitly name people as being involved in all sorts of illegal, immoral, and disgusting behavior and include as much personally identifying information as can be found are routinely made on Fairfax Underground; it’s a troll’s paradise.