The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
Why Online Education is a Game-Changer for Nurses
September 25, 2023

Online education has revolutionized the way nurses acquire knowledge and skills by providing them with a flexible and accessible learning...

CSU students on affirmative action

Enrique Carbajal, a junior political science and sociology major with a concentration in criminal justice, believes he owes his opportunity at higher education to affirmative action.

“You wouldn’t see me walking around campus I believe without Affirmative Action,” Carbajal said.


Wednesday, the Supreme Court began hearing oral arguments in Fisher vs. The University of Texas, the case that may put new limits on affirmative action.

Carbajal grew up in a small town and then moved to Denver with his middle class family.

“Access to schooling was always a priority in my family,” Carbajal said.

When going through high school, Carbajal didn’t believe he was going to go to college.

“That was until a counselor pushed me to apply,” Carbajal said. “The motivation was the amount of opportunities I would have, availability to better jobs, and to set a good example for my younger siblings.”

Carbajal wants to take advantage to serve his country by possibly being a deputy of state or a foreign service officer in other nations.

“As a result of affirmative action a lot of doors have opened for me.” Carbajal said. “Historically it’s a huge move in the right direction to repair bad history and it’s enabled me to be where I’m at now.”

A lot of students don’t realize that affirmative action is for them according to Carbajal.

“It’s not unconstitutional because everyone should have equal access….” Carbajal said. “It’s unfair to see it as reverse discrimination.”


Though, opponents believe that affirmative action goes against the Constitution by not giving some an advantage in getting into college and not others.

Connor Rock, a sophomore sociology student, believes while affirmative action may have the right ideas, the way that it is carried out is missing the mark.

“Affirmative action is done with good intention; in the way that it tries to level the playing field,” Rock said. “However, the current system of affirmative action couldn’t be less ideal.”

According to Rock, nothing can be determined on just a facade of race, but a case-by-case need process.

Daniel McLane, a sociology professor, believes that all students can benefit from a diverse campus.

“Sociologists call it ‘cultural capital’ and it’s a skill set to be used when they get into the job market,” McLane said. “I think there needs to be an honest debate if affirmative action is effective.”

In 2003, California declared affirmative action in Proposition 209, to be unconstitutional, which resulted in huge plummet of diversity on the campus in terms of Hispanic and African American students according to McLane.

If the Supreme Court were to reflect California’s decision according to McLane one more tool would be taken away to level the playing field and, “it’s possible that some campuses will becomes less diverse.”

Diversity beat reporter and entertainment reporter Bailey Constas (@BaileyLiza) can be reached at

View Comments (2)
More to Discover

Hey, thanks for visiting!
We’d like to ask you to please disable your ad blocker when looking at our site — advertising revenue directly supports our student journalists and allows us to bring you more content like this.

Comments (2)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *