The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
Five Things We Learned Delivering Over Half a Million Orders for NoCo Restaurants
Five Things We Learned Delivering Over Half a Million Orders for NoCo Restaurants
November 8, 2023

  In May 2019, Nosh began as a humble restaurant co-op with just three people. When the pandemic hit in March 2020, while many businesses...

Amendment S impacts state personnel, including higher education employees

A proposed amendment to modernize the state personnel system would have negligible effect on state classified employees at CSU.

Put on the ballot with bipartisan support from the Colorado legislature, Amendment S seeks to change a system which hasn’t been updated in 40 years.


It “would have very little substantial impact” to hiring practices and operations at CSU and other higher education systems, said Tony DeCrosta, executive director of human resources at CSU.

“I don’t see it being a huge change for how we do business at CSU,” he added.

He said of the approximately 6,200 employees at CSU, about 2,000 fall under the state classified designation, which is the group impacted by the amendment. State classified employees at CSU include some custodial staff, engineers, IT workers and others.

Faculty and administration make up the other 4,200 employees and are exempted from the state civil system.

One of the more significant changes would be the universities ability to look at six finalists for any job.

Under the current system, an agency can only have three finalists for a job, applicants must live in the state of Colorado and temporary/seasonal workers are recruited and trained at taxpayer expense but aren’t allowed to return a second year to work.

If approved, Amendment S would give preference to veterans for hiring, allow temporary workers to return a second year, allow six finalists for a job instead of three and allow job applicants to live 30 miles outside the Colorado border. Political appointments will be expanded from 125 to 325 positions in the state’s senior executive service.

It would also change testing and hiring procedures for filling vacancies in the state personnel system. Currently, a job applicant is assessed through standardized testing. Amendment S would judge applicants on qualifications on top of a numerical exam score.

Those subjective measures might leave open the possibility of favoritism or people getting hired for a job they’re not actually qualified for, said Amendment S opponent Miller Hudson, the former executive director of the Colorado Association of Public Employees.


“We have a lot of jobs in state government where competence is extremely important, water control engineers, bridge engineers,” Hudson said.  “I don’t really care if the person is charming at a cocktail party, I want to make sure they know their stuff when we hire them.”

Hudson also believes it would give the governor too much power in civil service appointments.

Amendment S would allow governors to exempt as many as 25 positions that now are strictly merit-based and allow these positions to be politically appointed. It also gives the governor the ability to remove or appoint two members on the five-member State Personnel Board.

Supporters of the bill include Gov. John Hickenlooper and former governors Bill Ritter and Bill Owens. In an opinion piece published Oct. 12 in the Denver Post the three governors wrote in favor of the Amendment.

“(The current system) has made it difficult to fill vacancies in a timely manner,” they wrote. “That leads to backlogs in state permitting and services that businesses depend on. Amendment S makes it easier to identify and hire great workers.”

Hudson argues that under the current system, hard work and a lifetime dedicated to public service means that a motivated person could rise to high in the ranks of the state’s civil service. Amendment S would be detrimental to state employees who want to be in leadership positions.

“I think it’s going to discourage the most talented employees from remaining with state government, knowing that there’s a glass ceiling,” Hudson said.  “Knowing that they’ll always have to be reporting to some political appointee.”

Hudson also said that Amendment S would have minimal impact on current employees in higher education since most if not all of the high level administration job’s at public universities are exempted.
Senior reporter Austin Briggs can be reached at

View Comments (6)
More to Discover

Hey, thanks for visiting!
We’d like to ask you to please disable your ad blocker when looking at our site — advertising revenue directly supports our student journalists and allows us to bring you more content like this.

Comments (6)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *