The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
The Impact of Technological Innovations on Sports Betting in Colorado: A Primer
The Impact of Technological Innovations on Sports Betting in Colorado: A Primer
April 18, 2024

In the sports betting domain, Colorado stands as a unique arena where technological advancements have significantly reshaped the landscape. As...

Book review: ‘Go Set a Watchman’

Go Set a Watchman

I read this book because I loved “To Kill a Mockingbird.” For that exact same reason, I was disappointed in “Go Set a Watchman.”


Mockingbird was a well-written, interesting novel that addressed compelling social issues in a coming-of-age story. Contrary to this, Watchman is dry, filled with clichés and unheroic characters.

Scout has grown up.

No longer the child from Harper Lee’s beloved first novel, 26-year-old Jean Louise returns to Maycomb, Alabama, to visit Atticus, her elderly father with arthritis.

The action in “Go Set a Watchman” does not begin until about 30 percent into the book. Here, we learn Atticus is not the progressive man we believed he was in “To Kill a Mockingbird.” Jean Louise discovers her father’s segregationist pamphlets. The audience is just as shocked as she is to learn that Atticus believes whites are mentally superior to blacks.

Just like Lee’s audience, Scout learns that her idealized father from Mockingbird is not a god. He is a man with faults, but she still loves him. Scout embodies how I felt: upset, but still understanding of Atticus’s humanity. However, my emotions toward his actions would not be nearly as extreme without MockingbirdOnly in context of Lee’s other work am I able to feel the same emotions as Jean Louise.

The majority of the book focuses on descriptions of the town and character relations. This background information is interesting purely because of its relation to “To Kill a Mockingbird.” I enjoyed reading about Jem and Scout as adults because I related to their mischievous childhoods in Mockingbird. Maycomb was fascinating only because I knew of its Southern charm and overt racism from Lee’s famous novel. However, by its own merit, Watchman drags on with over-used clichés and stereotypical characters.

I do not blame Lee for this, though. Watchman was meant as a first draft and she did not intend to publish the book. This is obvious in the writing. Much of the book harkens back to “To Kill a Mockingbird.” There is substantial overlap between the two books, making me believe that this book simply led to Lee’s successful novel.

For example, in chapter four of WatchmanLee describes the family dynamics between the Cunninghams and the Coninghams. She writes, “Jeems Cunningham testified that his mother spelled it Cunningham occasionally on deeds and things but she was really a Coningham, she was an uncertain speller, and she was given to looking far away sometimes when she sat on the front porch.” She writes nearly the exact same description in Mockingbird in chapter 16. 

These are the main similarities between the books. Compared to Mockingbird, the writing in Watchman is weaker, the characters are disappointing and the children we loved are adults.


Scout is now Jean Louise. She has matured and, as an audience, we are forced to mature as well. The growing pains, however, are found amidst poor plot development and verbose writing. Read the book simply for nostalgic purposes, but do not expect Lee’s second novel to be another “To Kill a Mockingbird.”

Collegian News Editor Hannah Ditzenberger can be reached at or on Twitter at @h_ditzenberger

View Comments (2)
More to Discover

Comments (2)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *