The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
The Impact of Technological Innovations on Sports Betting in Colorado: A Primer
The Impact of Technological Innovations on Sports Betting in Colorado: A Primer
April 18, 2024

In the sports betting domain, Colorado stands as a unique arena where technological advancements have significantly reshaped the landscape. As...

Film Review: ‘Chappie’

Chappie” was as lifeless and glitchy as its starring robot.

Flash back to August 2009. I sat down in my favorite theater in Colorado Springs to see a film that honestly looked a little weird and from a first-time director, Neill Blomkamp. But the critics were losing it and Peter Jackson was producing, so I had to go. Its visuals, compelling story and social satire quickly made it one of my favorite sci-fi films, ever.


That was “District 9,” the film that put Blomkamp on the map. Flash forward four years later to “Elysium.” I was thoroughly excited. I thought, “wow, this is gonna be ‘District 9’ but with an even better cast. What could go wrong?” A lot. But I passed it off as Blomkamp’s sophomore feature slump, something many filmmakers go through.

Image courtesy of IMDb. “Chappie” was released March 6.

Today I saw “Chappie,” and I was ready to forgive “Elysium” and get lost in this new film.

What a disappointment. Blomkamp, what are you doing?

First of all, hackers are once again portrayed incorrectly. Dev Patel plays Deon, an engineer who, like many Hollywood computer experts, has the magical ability to bend machines to his will with less than 10 keystrokes and wild flurry of fingers across the screen.

Ninja and Yo-landi Visser, of rap group Die Antwoord, play gangsters who steal Chappie and take him under their wing. They are absolutely awful. Not only are they terrible actors, but they play terrible characters. Don’t bring in music artists as actors for a reason other than cute cameos. It’s pointless and lazy. Their characters are just stupid, uninteresting and make the worst decisions possible.

And speaking of Chappie, that robot sucks. He isn’t relatable at all, doesn’t really display any emotion and his lack of facial expressions didn’t really lend anything to his humanity. He really paled in comparison to self-aware machines in other films like in “I, Robot,” “A.I. Artificial Intelligence” and “WALL-E.”

I’m a die-hard Hugh Jackman fan, and he just got served an awful character to play. His hardcore religious character, Vincent, has the strangest motivations ever, and a super-powerful “Moose” robot, which is given great anticipation but doesn’t deliver in the end.

The one aspect of “Chappie” I did like, which has been a plus of all of Blomkamp’s films, is the visual style and effects. They’re really top-notch and always make even the ugliest of locations aesthetically pleasing. And the motion capture of Sharlto Copley as Chappie is fantastic.

Blomkamp has just lost his storytelling touch. I was hoping “Elysium” was just a misstep, but if “Chappie” is what we are to expect of him, then I would say his career won’t go on much longer.


This is especially sad because Blomkamp is already confirmed to direct an “Alien” film. Now instead of failing his own projects, he is going to ruin a franchise millions of people have come to love. I sincerely hope he doesn’t, but after “Chappie,” expectations are low.

Collegian A&E Film Beat Writer Morgan Smith can be reached at or on twitter @MDSFilms.

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Comments (0)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *