The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
Lando Norris in Miami. Accident win or the birth of a new star?
May 17, 2024

  On May 5, 2024, an essential event for Formula 1 occurred in Miami. One of the favorites of the world public, the Briton Lando...

The presence of police officers in school criminalizes teenage behavior

This year at Spring Valley High School in South Carolina, according to The Washington Post, there were “videos showing a police officer throwing a high school student across a classroom.” The details around the video are as follows: there was a disruptive student in a classroom, and when asked to leave, she wouldn’t. In turn, a deputy officer came in and physically removed the young lady. I’m positive we all have an opinion as to who was really to blame, and whether or not the officer was in the right, but that’s another topic for a different day. What I would like to focus on is the detrimental effects of having police officers in high schools, which ultimately creates a funnel from high schools to jails.

A lot of parents have a similar discussion with their children about the importance of education, and usually that discussion includes something to the effect that without an education, you could end up in jail, on the streets or dead. This discussion has probably frightened so many children to get their education in order to prevent these three life-altering ultimatums. But what parents might not have realized while giving these speeches is that there are now rules and laws implemented in schools that take the disciplinary actions out of the schools’ hands, and places them into the hands of the criminal justice system — a system that is built to turn children into adults.


The American Civil Liberties Union calls this the “School to Prison Pipeline.” Ultimately this pipeline is a result of schools’ zero-tolerance policies, which has lead to many schools bringing in police officers to help keep order. Because of this, when a student breaks a school rule or has minor school infractions, the school passes the issue to those police officers instead of handling it themselves, and is therefore now in the hands of the criminal justice system and the juvenile system. The end result is that teenagers are now being criminalized for problems that shouldn’t have went further than the principle or dean’s office.

Instead of teaching our children about the criminal justice system and teaching them to avoid negative contact with the justice system, those who have the ability to do so, such as the officers present in schools, are helping them get into trouble with the justice system. This is detrimental because these are our future leaders, educators and business owners, and now they are being treated as criminals, miscreants and trouble makers for teenage behavior. These labels are a hindrance because now a simple teenage act of rebellion that was nothing more than that has labeled them as unteachable and undesirable by not only colleges and universities, but by potential employers as well.

 I do agree that it is the parent’s responsibility to ensure that their child behaves and is respectful in school and out of school. With that being said, a parent can only speak to and correct what they see as a parent. Once their child goes to school, they interact with tons of other children, and the teachers there are in contact with those children a lot more than some of these children’s working parents. These teachers see the behavior changes, they see and interact with these children on such a large scale. If teachers don’t feel comfortable to contact parents in order to bring the issues up that is why there is detention and in school suspension, that’s why there are teachers, security guards, counselors, deans, vice principals, and that is why there is a principle. These individuals should serve as a net to catch those students who are and may fall through the cracks, but to tell students who have tripped and not yet fallen that their menial actions have surpassed all of these barriers and reached the police, is a serious issue.

I personally don’t feel like it is a question of what is being fostered at home, because sometimes the image children create for their parents isn’t the same image that they create at school, but rather the question of who we allow to educate our children and the measures that they are taking to not only provide a safe place to educate, but to also prepare students for their futures. If rebellious high school students who don’t leave the classroom is so outlandish and difficult to where it surpassed not only the teachers, the security, school counselors, the deans, vice principle, and the principle and went right to the police officer not only do I question the actions of the police officer involved but I also question the leadership and actions of the school.

These are children and children will be children. They don’t deserve to have their futures negatively altered because of faulty school policies. The children today are our future tomorrow and when something goes wrong we as adults and individuals in higher education have to show that not only do we see them but that we support them through their teenage issues.

 Collegian Columnist Chynna Fayne can be reached at or on Twitter @Chynna Fayne.

View Comments (8)
More to Discover

Comments (8)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • C

    CarinaDec 4, 2015 at 12:46 am

    I remember the officer in my school being a person of safety. I appreciated their presence and never thought of it as a way of criminalizing the students. I personally feel like it’s off base calling a high school student a “child”. High schoolers are young adults searching for their voice, they are no longer children. If you want to be treated with the respect of an adult you must act as an adult and not expect to be seen as a child.

    Many freshmen college students are 1 year out of high school. I am sure they would not consider themselves children now or when they were in high school. High School is the time, as emerging adults, that we begin to take responsibility for our own actions instead of acting as children.

    This is only in reference to this article and in no way am I adding opinions about the incident you refer to in the beginning of the article.