The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
5 Strategies for Landing Your Dream Job After Graduation
July 11, 2024

Graduated and feeling lost about your next steps? Looking to set up your life, find a good job, and earn money? Who doesn’t want that, right?...

Larimer Sheriff should respect local vote on Amendment 64

Sean Kennedy
Sean Kennedy

Just as no member of the public is above the law, neither is any official of the law above the public.

Last Thursday, Larimer County Sheriff Justin Smith joined law enforcement officials from Colorado, Kansas and Nebraska in a lawsuit against the state of Colorado that seeks to strike down Amendment 64. The lawsuit argues for the federal government’s right to regulate drugs and claims that the state’s legalization of marijuana has harmed communities in neighboring states.


While the latter could be a legitimate concern for law enforcement in Kansas and Nebraska, this lawsuit is not an issue Sheriff Smith should be getting involved in. The law enforcement issues of other states are not any of his business, and as a locally-elected official, Smith’s focus of law enforcement should be on local and state ordinances. As a public official, Sheriff Smith needs to put the interests of his constituency ahead of his own political motives and cease his involvement with this selfish and suspect litigation against our state.

There is little evidence to suggest that this lawsuit is anything more than a publicity move on Sheriff Smith’s part to serve his own political interests. Smith claims that the lawsuit seeks to clarify conflicting state and federal laws concerning marijuana, but there isn’t any data that demonstrates Amendment 64’s contradiction with federal law is an issue for state law enforcement. The Justice Department has had the option to use federal supremacy to enforce drug laws for years in states that have legalized marijuana, but according to an article in the Coloradoan, they have opted to take a hands-off approach as long as marijuana legislation seek to keep the drug away from children and criminals. The problem Smith identified has not been an issue. If the federal government wanted to challenge marijuana legalization in Colorado, it would have done so by now.

Furthermore, federal enforcement of drug laws is not an issue that should concern Sheriff Smith. As a member of local law enforcement, Smith’s duty is primarily to enforce local and state law. Enforcement of federal law is not his business. Law enforcement officials are, by definition, public servants, and therefore are beholden to serve interests of their voting constituency. Sheriff Smith’s local constituency voted 55 to 45 percent to legalize marijuana, and yet he is pursuing litigation that specifically aims to revoke that right from voters for his own self-interest.

Smith needs to remember that law officials are not above the public, and respect the decision of Colorado voters to legalize marijuana. Advancing one’s own political agenda is part of local politics, but not at the expense of the clear wishes of one’s constituency. The legalization of marijuana, while imperfect, is here to stay in Colorado, and Smith needs to respect that. There may be law enforcement concerns from neighboring states or federal agencies, but that is a matter for those states and those officials to sort out themselves. Local voters need to remind Sheriff Smith to whom his responsibilities lie in this next election. If he wishes to fight others’ battles, he can do so by finding a job somewhere else.

Collegian Senior Columnist Sean Kennedy can be reached at or on Twitter @seanskenn.

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Comments (0)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *