The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
Why Online Education is a Game-Changer for Nurses
September 25, 2023

Online education has revolutionized the way nurses acquire knowledge and skills by providing them with a flexible and accessible learning...

ASCSU conducts survey on Colorado State stadium

William Clem
William Clem

Over the next two weeks, ASCSU will be conducting a student survey in regards to Dr. Frank’s four stadium “options.” While this survey is a step in the right direction, it still has several fundamental flaws.

This student survey, which was voted on by ASCSU on Oct. 22, is aimed at showing students’ opinions concerning each Dr. Frank’s four “options.” On top of finding student opinions, the survey will also provide some brief information to “educate” the students on the four options. According to its creators, the survey will be emailed to students, along with information about each of the options, which have been literally cut and pasted from the website.


Due to its design, there are several major oversights which undermine the effectiveness of this survey. First and foremost, this website which is being used to “educate” students is entirely speculative, and hasn’t even had a feasibility study conducted, so the costs and benefits outlined have no factual basis. Its also important to remember that creator of these options (Dr. Frank),  has been trying to push a main campus stadium for the last two years. Bottom line, this survey is asking students to make decisions based on unverified facts, which are coming from a biased source.

While this survey may have its shortcomings, we as a school have a much larger problem. Historically, Tony Frank and his administration have been indifferent to public opinion about the stadium. In 2012 a much larger and more comprehensive survey concerning the stadium was done. In this survey, 67 percent of students surveyed said they were against an on-campus stadium, even if it was funded outside of the general fund. Along with this student survey, there have been multiple polls and surveys conducted where a majority of Fort Collins residents have expressed their opposition to an on-campus stadium. Yet in spite of this, Dr. Frank and his administration have continually pushed a main campus stadium, even after they failed to raise the necessary funds. Clearly, the opinions of students and Fort Collins citizens are not a factor in Dr. Frank’s decision-making process.

So what does all this mean? Should we not participate in this survey? Absolutely not, it’s important that we continue to voice our opinions, whatever they might be. But it shouldn’t stop there. We as students need to get involved in this process, especially now that all four options involve the student general fund. As a student body, we need to convey to this administration that it is our money they are spending, and we have a right to have a say in how it is spent. If you want to have your voice heard, email Dr. Frank at and the board of governors at

Collegian Columnist William Clem can be reached at

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Hey, thanks for visiting!
We’d like to ask you to please disable your ad blocker when looking at our site — advertising revenue directly supports our student journalists and allows us to bring you more content like this.

Comments (0)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *