The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
Lando Norris in Miami. Accident win or the birth of a new star?
May 17, 2024

  On May 5, 2024, an essential event for Formula 1 occurred in Miami. One of the favorites of the world public, the Briton Lando...

Abortion protesters: leave your children at home

Haleigh McGill
Haleigh McGill

A lot of people who gather outside of Planned Parenthood to protest abortion, like those who stand near the intersection of Shields and Elizabeth, often bring their own children to protest with them. These children are typically too young to understand the cause, and their opinions of abortion are heavily conditioned by their parents’ beliefs and actions. What if those children grow up and decide that they feel differently about the concept of abortion than their parents do? Or even worse, what if they grow up to protest abortion, only because that’s what their parents said was right? I do understand parents wanting to share their values and beliefs with their children while helping to shape their identity, but it is unfair to to bring them to a protest that they don’t fully comprehend that could lead to the formation of forced and uninformed pro-life perspectives.

We can compare this to the example of how some parents try to force their religious beliefs upon their children, which is appropriate, given that religion is a major motivator for the abortion protesters. During a presentation that took place at Harvard University in 2003, Oxford Scientist Richard Dawkins argued that religion is a “societal norm that stems from children’s psychological tendencies.”


“It’s their unique obedience that makes them vulnerable,” Dawkins said. “Society provides a breeding ground for the ‘virus’ of religion by labeling children with the religion of their parents. Children, in turn, absorb these beliefs because they are conditioned to do so.”

Dr. Gordon Coates, author of many publications including the Wanterfall eBooks series, explained the more general nature of parent-child conditioning in the section of the Wanterfall text titled The Ramifications of Emotions.

“Combine operant conditioning with saturation exposure of the young mind to the beliefs and attitudes of the parents and other family members, and what do you get? You get the beginnings of conditioning of the child’s mind – for some of the influences are sure to persist, and to affect the child’s beliefs, stored emotions, attitudes and consequent reactions in the future,” Coates said.

These two statements are exactly my point. The parents who bring their young children to abortion protests are conditioning them to form opinions and attitudes on the basis of “my parents said this is right”. Children so often learn by example or parental modeling, which is not appropriate for a concept as complex as abortion, because it requires extensive critical thinking from the individual. Opinions about abortion should not be learned by a “monkey see, monkey do” sort of phenomenon. Also, because these children are not able to speak for themselves on the subject in the midst of a protest due to a lack of true understanding, their parents are essentially using them as props. Whether it be to enhance the emotional impact of the idea of “murdering” an unborn child by holding their own with one arm and an anti-abortion sign with the other, or to expose them to the environment and attitudes that their parents want them to adopt, it’s not right.

Collegian Columnist Haleigh McGill can be reached at, or on Twitter @HaleighMcGill.

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Comments (0)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *