The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
Crypto Exchange Listing: Types of Exchanges and Compliance Requirements
March 25, 2024

The crypto industry continues to evolve, fueled by the increasing institutional adoption of crypto. Today, numerous companies are entering the...

Frank Needs to Address Present, Not Past

Sean Kennedy
Sean Kennedy

We cannot rest on our laurels. Last week, in his annual Presidential Address, Tony Frank spoke about the pride he has in all that CSU has accomplished in recent years, and we do indeed have a lot to be proud of. In the last five years, we have improved in almost every area across the board  retention rate, graduation rate, private fundraising, you name it. We can now boast that we are the largest university in the state, with nationally lauded science research programs and student media.

However, we cannot ride the reins of our recent success indefinitely, a point echoed in Frank’s address. We face an uncertain future with lots of questions, the answers to which will have an enormous bearing on the future trajectory of our community. Unfortunately, while Tony Frank seems to grasp the importance of our future, he said nothing in his speech to answer these questions. With so many issues facing our community in the next five years, we need administration to — no pun intended  be frank with us.

Ad

The problem is a lack of accountability; we as a community need to hold university leadership responsible for their decisions. Granted, our administration has developed an excellent track record and should be commended for leading our recent success, but this doesn’t mean they should be held in such high esteem that it is above questioning and transparency. Call me a stickler, but I think it’s wrong when President Frank is treated more like a frat brother than a leader; when there is more conversation about his beard than the future he has in mind for our tuition. As a student, I am much more concerned with the length of my bill than the length of any beard.

I realize the Presidential Address is certainly not a focal point for communication between administration and the community, but it provides an ideal forum for President Frank to start a dialogue with students and donors. For an authority that has been relatively mute about the controversial on-campus stadium all summer long, this does not instill much confidence that campus leadership will open up to us anytime soon. What about rising tuition? What about construction?

Frank did highlight these problems as issues that need to be addressed; but failed to see the irony in simply glancing over these obstacles while at an address. We Rams deserve answers from our leadership, not statements. It is our dollars that will be spent on these dilemmas, and we must demand more information.

With the rise of tuition and the construction around campus seeming to carry on ad infinitum, it is imperative that we begin to expect more from our leadership. While President Frank have a done a tremendous job leading our community to this point, we must not treat them as if they are above reproach or accountability. We cannot buy in to Frank’s ambiguous attitude about the future. In his address, he said that there is no one with whom he would rather address these questions than all of us. Let’s start, Mr. President.

Collegian Columnist Sean Kennedy can be reached by email at letters@collegian.com or on Twitter at @seanskenn

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Comments (0)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *