The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
Lando Norris in Miami. Accident win or the birth of a new star?
May 17, 2024

  On May 5, 2024, an essential event for Formula 1 occurred in Miami. One of the favorites of the world public, the Briton Lando...

Democracy and capitalism cannot purely coexist

Res Stecker
Res Stecker

When asking random people on the street what they believe America is, it is a pretty safe bet that the words “capitalism” and democracy” would be thrown around quite a bit, along with people simply shouting “’Merica!” And while I appreciate obnoxious patriotism as much as the next person, I want to focus on if America is really a capitalistic based economy and if it really is a democracy.

I can probably assert, with fair assumptions, that my audience and peers will agree that America is most certainly not a democracy, at least in the purest sense. In fact, basic government classes will tell you that the United States is more of a republic. Although we have the choice to vote people in and out of office, there are not a ton of options with only two real parties to choose from, and when one gets elected, the opposite party fights hand and fist to ensure the other can do nothing of value to society.

Ad

Now, take our representative democratic system and couple it with our capitalistic economy, and we have a very problematic combination. Capitalism in its purest form may actually work out quite well for the common man, but in our nation this economic system is fused so tightly with the government that the result is a watered down economic and governmental system.

Think of it this way, the top 1 percent of Americans control 40 percent percent of the wealth, usually owing their wealth to the success of their parents or grandparents or to millions of people that work for them, rather than their own success. Economic inequality is deplorable, but it also destroys the fairness of our political process.

The top 1 percent are going to fight like mad to stay in control, which is easily done via politics. When is the last time you saw the biography of a president or senator that said “born on the streets, but elected because of his ability, not because of corporations buying him off”?

The answer to that question is probably never. We have a few rules about how much money corporations can give to politician’s campaigns, but who cares? The only people running for the important offices are the people that are so loaded they wouldn’t know what it felt like to choose between food and rent. And this is true for both parties.

This may seem like really heavy rambling, but the following sentence should make this argument perfectly clear. By allowing only the rich to actively run for office, we embolden and encourage these same people to make laws that benefit only themselves economically. They are using the system of “democracy” in our nation to further their own capitalistic intentions, at the expense of everyone else, creating the dilution of both systems

The semi-free market in this country undeniably favors the already well off. That’s just how it is; how America is. But this system allows the same people to promote their interests into the political scene over and over again. Think of the Bush family and how mediocre they were. And its effect balloons out at the expense of the other 99 percent of Americans, through blood or sweat.

There is no way to separate the economy from the government. Anyone who says otherwise is a liar, as laissez-faire is far too impractical in the modern day and has been since at least 1930s. Our government is the economy and vice-versa. There is really no alternative would make more sense for America than our current system. As Winston Churchill said, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except all the others that have been tried.”

The purpose of this article is to draw attention to the fact that massive wealth inequality is too often enforced and encouraged by Americans electing politicians who only want to maximize corporate profits, with the lie that it will somehow help the average person.

This isn’t an attack on the rich, simply the rich using politics to get richer. Ideally, only the 99 percent would be elected to office.

Ad

To believe that we truly have a democracy is to ignore the truth, and it is a false hope that continuously electing people made rich by their success in a capitalistic system will do anything but continue the governmental policies on the economy that made them so fortunate to begin with.

Richard Stecker is a senior international studies and history double major, and is happy to write witty whimsical words of wisdom for all. Questions and comments can be sent to letters@collegian.com

View Comments (9)
More to Discover

Comments (9)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • B

    BoiseboundSep 28, 2014 at 4:52 pm

    “Think of it this way, the top 1 percent of Americans control 40
    percent percent of the wealth, usually owing their wealth to the
    success of their parents or grandparents or to millions of people that
    work for them, rather than their own success. Economic inequality is
    deplorable, but it also destroys the fairness of our political process.” Simply not true. So many speeches and marches are based on this lie. If only we’d value, instead of vilify, the creation of new wealth and the people who know how to produce…If only people would realize the ‘income gap’ is a non-issue; then we could get back to assuring everyone, rich or poor, could climb to the next level.

    If you could double the wealth of the poorest Americans, but in the process it would triple the wealth of the richest—would you do it?

    Reply
  • S

    SpencerDec 13, 2013 at 11:38 am

    PURE CAPITALISM is akin to the Wild West. It’s savage and brutal. What we need to do is fix communism. This capitliast experiment is a waste of time. Even Einstein said so.

    Reply