Editor’s Note: All opinion section content reflects the views of the individual author only and does not represent a stance taken by The Collegian or its editorial board. Letters to the Editor reflect the view of a member of the campus community and are submitted to the publication for approval.
To the Colorado State University administration,
Over the course of my time as a student at CSU, I’ve come to deeply value the Ramily we’ve built. I see myself reflected in the students I pass on campus, whether or not I know them personally.
My heart is with every member of this community, and right now, that community is under threat.
Since the start of the current federal administration, it feels as though CSU’s leadership has seized the moment to suppress its marginalized populations. The climate on campus has grown increasingly hostile, and the administration’s silence in the face of bias incidents, hate crimes and discrimination is unacceptable.
These issues are not new; they’ve persisted for years. And yet, despite repeated protests and calls for change, the response from administration leadership has been consistently inadequate.
The original platform for reporting bias incidents had quietly been renamed on the CSU website; the ability to update pronouns or preferred names in RAMweb was removed and only reinstated when students protested; free speech policies have shifted; the Incident Management Team continues to make decisions impacting identities held within the Cultural Resource Centers without our input; and the Trans Day of Remembrance ceremony was stripped of using any university resources to put on the vigil.
Several years ago, a noose was found outside a Black student’s dorm room. Swastikas were painted in our dorm halls. This past school year, the Black Lives Matter Mural was defaced. The N-word was written on a student’s car in the library parking lot.
And, most alarmingly, funding for our Cultural Resource Centers is under threat — all while the university celebrates record-breaking research expenditures and donor contributions. As reported by The Coloradoan, CSU’s research spending surpassed $600 million in the 2024-25 academic year, despite ongoing concerns about federal funding cuts.
So when we ask about protecting DEI initiatives and the first response from the administration is, “We don’t want to risk our funding,” it rings hollow. The numbers speak for themselves — this isn’t about scarcity. It’s about priorities.
Students have been pleading with you to do better. We’ve organized, we’ve met with key figures — Amy Parsons, Blanche Hughes, Kauline Cipriani — and we’ve asked for transparency, accountability and meaningful change. Instead, communication has deteriorated. Transparency has eroded. Our trust in the administration continues to decline.
Let me be clear: You are accountable to the students. We are the reason this institution thrives. We are the reason donors invest. And yet, our voices are being ignored. For those in administration who identify with marginalized communities, your silence is especially painful; you have the power to advocate for us, and choosing not to is a betrayal.
Why is it that when marginalized students ask for support, the response is silence, deflection or the removal of resources? We’ve met with you. We’ve advocated. We’ve exhausted every channel available to us. And still, we are not heard.
This is a final call to do better. The erosion of protections for marginalized communities doesn’t just harm those directly affected — it undermines the safety and the integrity of the entire campus. You know better, so why aren’t you doing better?
We cannot afford to be passive. Compliance will not protect us. Conceding to oppressive systems will not solve our problems. The administration, both federal and institutional, will continue to strip away our rights unless we resist. Students know we deserve better.
Ferrin Jaudon, ASCSU Speaker Pro Tempore
Send letters to letters@collegian.com. When submitting letters, please abide by the guidelines listed at collegian.com.

Jocelyn • Mar 23, 2026 at 5:09 am
In response to Ferrin Jaudon’s letter, I want to expand the conversation beyond DEI as a programmatic concern and name what this really is: a failure to uphold legal, ecological and educational responsibilities that are foundational to the land-grant institution Colorado State University.
The obligations of this university do not begin and end with internal policy decisions or donor pressures. They begin with Treaties, which remain the supreme law of the land, and with the responsibilities outlined in the Morrill Act of 1862: to serve the commons, to provide practical education, and to ensure that knowledge is used to sustain life.
If those responsibilities were being met in full, we would not see the need for programs like Rams Against Hunger, food banks or emergency assistance as primary solutions. Education at a land-grant university should, at a bare minimum, equip students with the knowledge and systems to feed themselves and their communities. That requires not just classrooms, but living systems—soil, water, seeds, and relationships -protected and stewarded with intention.
This campus holds extraordinary potential. It could function as a living demonstration of what it means to live in balance: a place where ecological restoration, food sovereignty, and partnership with displaced Intra-National Nations are not symbolic, but operational through Co-Governance. Traditional Ecological Knowledge is not supplemental—it is foundational to long-term resilience in every course and program.
What we see instead is a pattern of disconnection between stated values and lived reality.
A Native student working to protect a wild strawberry patch—an act of stewardship—was referred to conflict coaching, while institutional accountability remained absent. Land tied to programming in ecosystem restoration has not been restored in meaningful ways, and the cost of that failure has been externalized onto the Fort Collins community, such as Hughes Stadium. Even recently, beavers working to repair a floodplain ecosystem near the student experimental gardens were removed rather than engaged as ecological partners.
These are not isolated incidents. They reflect a broader pattern:
What is done to people is done to the land, and what is done to the land returns to people.
We are already living the consequences: in wildfires across Colorado, in water instability, in food insecurity, and in the growing strain placed on communities.
The values that CSU promoting stewardship, inclusion, and responsibility are not inherently flawed. Values that are not enacted daily become hollow. It is often those who have been historically marginalized and silenced who continue to carry the burden of holding those values in practice, even as their voices are dismissed.
This is not simply about representation or programming. It is about alignment with law, with land, and with life-supporting systems.
Do better, CSU—not in words, but in action.