The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

The Student News Site of Colorado State University

The Rocky Mountain Collegian

Print Edition
Letter to the editor submissions
Have a strong opinion about something happening on campus or in Fort Collins? Want to respond to an article written on The Collegian? Write a Letter to the Editor by following the guidelines here.
Follow Us on Twitter
The Impact of Technological Innovations on Sports Betting in Colorado: A Primer
The Impact of Technological Innovations on Sports Betting in Colorado: A Primer
April 18, 2024

In the sports betting domain, Colorado stands as a unique arena where technological advancements have significantly reshaped the landscape. As...

It’s wrong for city officials to threaten Foothills Mall Sears with eminent domain

The Fort Collins City Council, acting as the Urban Renewal Authority and the new owners of Foothills Mall, approved an agreement that provides the beginning steps to formalize the city’s ability to invoke eminent domain to seize land that’s a part of the 100-acre mall property.

Eminent domain is the power of the government to take private property for public use with the compensation for the land seized at market price.

Ad

In regards to the Foothills Mall, there are indications that the possible invocation of eminent domain is being considered on questionable reasoning and may be carried out not for the public good, but instead for private gain.

Sears owns its building in the mall and has rejected an offer to sell the premises to developers Alberta Development Partners and Walton Street Capital, who purchased the mall in July.

Fort Collins officials have already decided the mall is “a menace to the public health, safety, and welfare of the community,” approving an urban renewal plan for the area in 2007, though the city has not filed for condemnation or not.

Condemnation of the mall? The study cites various general infrastructural problems and missing improvements, yet doesn’t cite a single example of anyone getting hurt — not much of a menace to the community, we’d say.

Instead, this threat of eminent domain appears as though somebody is trying to strongarm Sears into forfeiting the land they are legally entitled to with the threat of taking the land by force with the property rights-subverting governmental tool that is eminent domain.

View Comments (4)
More to Discover

Comments (4)

When commenting on The Collegian’s website, please be respectful of others and their viewpoints. The Collegian reviews all comments and reserves the right to reject comments from the website. Comments including any of the following will not be accepted. 1. No language attacking a protected group, including slurs or other profane language directed at a person’s race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social class, age, physical or mental disability, ethnicity or nationality. 2. No factually inaccurate information, including misleading statements or incorrect data. 3. No abusive language or harassment of Collegian writers, editors or other commenters. 4. No threatening language that includes but is not limited to language inciting violence against an individual or group of people. 5. No links.
All The Rocky Mountain Collegian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *